We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

Close
In association with

Home > Opinion > FTAdviser Blog > Marc Shoffman's blogs

FTADVISER BLOG

Bankers are people too

I started a Masters in financial journalism in September. I had the pleasure of attending a heated lecture this week where the speaker waxed lyrical about how he felt the incompetence and excessive remuneration of bankers caused the latest economic crash.

By Marc Shoffman | Published Oct 07, 2011 | comments

He said the banks should have been allowed to fail, nationalised, split up and sold on once they returned to profit - this caused a student to storm out.

The student’s complaint was that this was an overly simplistic way of describing the crisis which neglected the role of the regulators, credit agencies, shareholders and investors, as well as the work some bankers put in and the wealth they created and spent in the economy.

The lecturer retorted that he would prefer they had done less work so less damage was done.

Is there a place for sticking up for financial services? Has the narrative moved on from the causes of the crash to the cures or are we stuck in a cycle of banker bashing?

Everybody accepts that “bankers” - the catch all term for individuals who involved themselves in risky lending practices - behaved irresponsibly. Some have suffered with regulatory bans, although others have got off with large pay-offs and a nice pension.

Should there be sympathy for bankers having their bonuses or pay cut? Maybe not. What about empathy for those left in the industry at firms now struggling from the prospect of another crash and facing bank failure or redundancy? They also have bills to pay.

It is easy to argue that bankers are paid too much because they do not contribute to society like a doctor or nurse. But how relevant is that point. People can choose their vocation. Is it a banker’s fault that the remuneration levels are so high?

Surely that is just capitalism? Should IFAs be sympathetic? After all, the advisory sector has often been demonised, particularly by the FSA which in the past has painted it as being full of commission hungry salesmen.

COMMENT AND REACTION

Our Columnists

Hal Austin

Hal is editor of Financial Adviser and has been for more than a decade. He has previously worked on a number of local and national publications.

Ashley Wassall

Ashley is editor of FTAdviser and writes on all areas of retail finance. Previously supplements editor at Money Management and editor of a European private equity publication.

John Kenchington

John is editor of Investment Adviser and has written about investments for several years. He has worked at titles including City AM and was recently named in the MHP 30 To Watch list of up-and-coming media names.

Jon Cudby

Jon is editor of Money Management and has 12 years' experience covering retail personal finance. In 2005, Jon was launch editor of FTAdviser and most recently he was head of online content for Incisive Media's financial services titles.

Tony Hazell

Tony is a freelance financial journalist, having been editor of Money Mail at the Daily Mail for a number of years. He has been writing a column in Financial Adviser since 2005.

John Lappin

John is a weekly contributor to Investment Adviser with 15 years’ experience in financial journalism and 10 years writing on the IFA sector. He was formerly editor of an IFA trade magazine.

Most Popular
More on FTAdviser
FTA jobs
  • PARAPLANNER

    Location: Horsham, West Sussex

    Salary: £30,000 basic + bonus (OTE £50,000)

  • Financial Planner

    Location: Cheshire

    Salary: To £36,000 + Car (BMW or Mercedes) + Benefits + Bonus

  • IFA

    Location: Cambridge

    Salary: £55000 - £75000 per annum