Home > Opinion > Hal Austin

Best and brightest

Here is an idea. You are familiar with the talk about fat-cat bankers and the huge salaries and benefits they enjoy, and the counter-argument that if we in Britain want to attract the best and brightest we have to be competitive with the US.

By Hal Austin | Published Jul 02, 2009 | comments

Article Tools

Since few Brits are chief executives in the US, it would suggest that even if salaries are competitive with the US, we are either managing to hold on to our brightest and best, or there is no real demand for them.

Or, look at it another way. How about reducing the salary packages of some of these bankers substantially, like Stephen Hester’s £9.6m to £1.6m, on a take it or leave it basis?

Would RBS still attract some of the brightest and best of their generation to express an interest in the job? And, could they do just as good a job?

Answers please on a postage stamp.

Article Tools

visible-status-Standard story-url-leader two july 2, 09 - banking.xml

Our Columnists

Janet Walford OBE

Janet has been editor of Money Management since 1986. Winner of 17 awards, she writes on all aspects of personal finance, but specialises in pensions.

Ashley Wassall

Ashley is editor of FTAdviser and writes on all areas of retail finance. Previously supplements editor at Money Management and editor of a European private equity publication.

John Lappin

John is a weekly contributor to Investment Adviser with 15 years’ experience in financial journalism and 10 years writing on the IFA sector. He was formerly editor of an IFA trade magazine.

Tony Hazell

Tony is a freelance financial journalist, having been editor of Money Mail at the Daily Mail for a number of years. He has been writing a column in Financial Adviser since 2005.

Philip Coggan

Philip is a weekly contributor to Investment Adviser and capital markets editor and Buttonwood columnist for the Economist. Previously worked for 20 years at the Financial Times.

More on FTAdviser
FTA jobs