Home > Opinion > Tony Hazell

A gamble that failed

Has saving into a stock market-based pension really been a waste of time? This is the central assertion in a paper by Dr Ros Altmann.

By Tony Hazell | Published May 28, 2009 | comments

Article Tools

The baby boomer generation has been engaged in a massive gamble that shares would produce enough money to pay a decent pension. And that gamble has failed, leaving many facing working into retirement or eeking out an impoverished existence.

While asking them to take the gamble, the government stacked the odds against them by reducing the tax benefits for pension funds.

Dr Altmann suggested that nobody should be gambling money on the stock market that they cannot afford to lose and that they would probably be better off investing in index-linked gilts.

While I agree with Dr Altmann on many issues related to pensions, I must take issue on this occasion. Yes, the generation coming up to retirement has taken a gamble and lost. Yes, they were encouraged to do this by the government and the investment industry.

But are gilts really the alternative? I believe in the capitalist system, I believe in a free market economy. And as such I have to believe that in the long-term shares and dividend growth will produce a better return than other forms of investment. Indeed, if it had not been for state interference in the form of Gordon Brown's tax raid on pensions, investors would have seen a far better return on their money.

There are lessons to be drawn from our current malaise, however. Investors must learn to curb their greed and be willing to convert their share investments into gilts and cash as they approach retirement. Currently they often have far too great an exposure to equities.

Financial advisers are often caught between a rock and a hard place here. If they advise reducing the risk on a portfolio and the stock market collapses, then they are heroes. But if the stock market continues to rise they can expect an earbashing from disgruntled clients who are likely to gripe about what they could have received, rather than being grateful for what they have got.

And, as Dr Altman says, the government has a role to play by issuing more long dated gilts to provide wider options for investors.

As is often the case, it all comes back to education. Investors must learn to accept realistic goals and their advisers must accept that there is more to a pension are flogging one off-the-shelf product from an insurance company.

Lost the plot

So FSA has bottled it once again. Faced with pressure from the insurance industry, they have backed away from fully enforcing a ban on using policyholders' money to mis-selling bills.

The decision appeared in document CP 09/09: "Proprietary firms will no longer be able to pay compensation and redress payments from their with-profits funds, where they arise out of events that occur after the rule takes effect. The position in relation to events prior to the effective date will be unchanged."

Page 1 of 2

Article Tools

visible-status-Standard story-url-hazellcolumn28may.xml

Our Columnists

Janet Walford OBE

Janet has been editor of Money Management since 1986. Winner of 17 awards, she writes on all aspects of personal finance, but specialises in pensions.

Hal Austin

Hal is editor of Financial Adviser and has been for more than a decade. He has previously worked on a number of local and national publications.

Ashley Wassall

Ashley is editor of FTAdviser and writes on all areas of retail finance. Previously supplements editor at Money Management and editor of a European private equity publication.

John Lappin

John is a weekly contributor to Investment Adviser with 15 years’ experience in financial journalism and 10 years writing on the IFA sector. He was formerly editor of an IFA trade magazine.

Philip Coggan

Philip is a weekly contributor to Investment Adviser and capital markets editor and Buttonwood columnist for the Economist. Previously worked for 20 years at the Financial Times.

More on FTAdviser
FTA jobs