We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

In association with

Home > Regulation > RDR News & Analysis

By Kevin White | Published Apr 12, 2012

RDR to do little for fees transparency

The survey of 100 IFAs by London-based investment management firm SCM Private, found that 64 per cent of IFAs thought the RDR would not improve transparency.

Some 78 per cent thought fund managers should be required to disclose the full breakdown of all fees incurred when investing a client’s money, and 60 per cent would be more inclined to invest if they could see fully where their money was invested.

Gina Miller, the co-founder of SCM Private, which is leading a campaign for the fund industry to disclose its charges clearly, said RDR was just a starting point.

Ms Miller said: “There is widespread support for transparency among IFAs but evidently there is concern RDR will not go far enough. It will give savers full detail on the amount they pay for advice but there is still a long way to go in terms of transparency regarding investment and pension fund costs, management charges and other fees.”

Colin Rothery, adviser for West Yorkshire-based Throgmorton Financial Services, said: “Anything that helps restore confidence to the market has to be applauded, but from my experience I’ve never had a client ask for more transparency from fund managers. I’m hoping that the RDR will greatly improve transparency, and I’d be interested to find out what fund managers think of this call. If you speak to them they would be clear there is certainly no smoke and mirrors in what they do.”

visible-status-Standard story-url-RDR Transparency 250 Kw.xml

Most Popular
More on FTAdviser
FTA jobs