We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

Close
In association with

Home > Opinion > John Lappin

Whither fund marketing after the RDR?

Most investment advisers will be relaxed about the declining number of fund launches and increased consolidation in the UK and Europe.

By John Lappin | Published May 14, 2012 | Your Industry | comments

Most investment advisers will be relaxed about the declining number of fund launches and increased consolidation in the UK and Europe.

It is not as if advisers will be left without a place to invest their clients’ money: indeed, many will feel the fund marketing whirl of the past 20 years has not always been in the best interests of consumers and clients.

But if a 2012 hiatus was inevitable because of the sheer scale of the regulatory disruption, how long will it last and what will emerge afterwards?

That the new ‘pay-to-play’ rate on commission is zero per cent doesn’t alter the fundamentals of marketing funds. In fact, budgets might get bigger

The big change after the RDR is that funds will not pay commission. Ostensibly, they will be cheaper having had the standard-issue initial commission stripped out – typically 3.5 per cent of clients’ investments.

One could argue that in the past, fund firms simply paid the going rate. Where commission was adjusted upwards in ‘special offers’ to increase fund flows, it was usually where funds were offered through life insurance firms. Investment trust and exchange-traded fund managers have always seen this differently, however. They argue that 3.5 per cent of a client’s assets was more than enough to ensure bias to certain products, if not to certain providers, and effectively prevented them attracting money from financial advisers and their clients.

Now that the new ‘pay-to-play’ rate on commission is zero per cent, fund firms have lost a significant lever. However, it doesn’t alter the fundamentals of marketing funds. In fact, budgets might get bigger, given that the original thinking behind paying commission on a unit trust, developed in the 1980s, was that it would mostly replace the marketing and advertising cost for the fund manager.

That was not quite how things turned out, but arguably the RDR frees up marketing budgets rather than diminishing them. Fund managers will still need to tell IFAs about new funds and make the case for existing ones, particularly if a fund management firm believes it is offering an overlooked gem. If you want direct sales and wish to attract funds, you may still see merit in, for example, poster advertising to reinforce the marketing messages of the big direct to consumer players. Publishers, media buyers and even public relations firms should perhaps take note.

The RDR also does not preclude new launches. We could see a spate of these once the regulatory dust settles on the new reform towards the end of next year. Launches have not stopped altogether in any case, but there are dozens of reasons why fund managers might offer a new approach which could manifest itself in a new fund. Some may even be waiting in the pipeline. These could include the demand for passively managed strategies with an actively managed component, the continued shift in global economic power, the increasing number of firms paying regular dividends worldwide and the rising influence of new participants in the markets such as sovereign wealth funds, to name but a few.

Page 1 of 2

COMMENT AND REACTION

Our Columnists

Hal Austin

Hal is editor of Financial Adviser and has been for more than a decade. He has previously worked on a number of local and national publications.

Ashley Wassall

Ashley is editor of FTAdviser and writes on all areas of retail finance. Previously supplements editor at Money Management and editor of a European private equity publication.

John Kenchington

John is editor of Investment Adviser and has written about investments for several years. He has worked at titles including City AM and was recently named in the MHP 30 To Watch list of up-and-coming media names.

Jon Cudby

Jon is editor of Money Management and has 12 years' experience covering retail personal finance. In 2005, Jon was launch editor of FTAdviser and most recently he was head of online content for Incisive Media's financial services titles.

Tony Hazell

Tony is a freelance financial journalist, having been editor of Money Mail at the Daily Mail for a number of years. He has been writing a column in Financial Adviser since 2005.

Most Popular
More on FTAdviser
FTA jobs
  • Financial Planning Director

    Location: UK wide

    Salary: On Application

  • Integration Manager

    Location: Birmingham

    Salary: The position pays up to £55,000 + car allowance of £8,000 + a bonus of up to 45% of salary

  • Field Sales Managers

    Location: UK wide

    Salary: Basic salary up to £70,000 + car allowance of £8000 + bonus up to 80% of salary. There is an additional bonus for attracting new talent to the business, which can be as much as £50,000 over 3 years as well as outstanding career development prospects