We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

Close
In association with

Home > Opinion > Simon Lovegrove

Bonuses at risk

In July last year the European Commission published its legislative proposals revising the capital requirements directive, comprising a draft capital requirements regulation and a new directive.

By Simon Lovegrove | Published May 30, 2012 | comments

Together the proposals are commonly referred to as CRD IV. The proposals have two key purposes – to implement the Basel III banking reforms and to create a single set of harmonised prudential rules in the European Union, commonly known as the single rule book.

On 15 May 2012, the Council of the European Union unanimously agreed a general approach to the CRD IV legislative proposals ahead of talks with the European parliament.

The proposals agreed by the council still contain the key Basel III requirements that banks will have to hold 4.5 per cent core tier-one capital (comprising common equity) and a further 2.5 per cent countercyclical buffer. However, the Basel III requirements requiring systemically important banks to hold a further 1 per cent to 2.5 per cent of capital were not included.

However, the council did agree to some concessions including the right for member states to impose, for up to two years, stricter capital requirements for domestically authorised financial institutions. Also, in addition to the new buffer requirements – the capital conservation buffer and the countercyclical capital buffer – member states may also apply a systemic risk buffer of up to 3 per cent for all exposures without seeking the prior permission of the EC.

The concessions agreed in the council are key for the UK legislative reform programme announced in the Queen’s Speech in that they allow the chancellor to move forward with the Banking Reform Bill which is intended to introduce the final recommendations produced by the Independent Commission on Banking. However, we are not quite there yet as the draft legislation still needs to be agreed with the European parliament. The chancellor faces a further difficult confrontation in that MEPs have already called for every financial institution to have “robust” governance arrangements including bankers’ bonuses not to exceed fixed salaries – something the City may not take kindly to.

Simon Lovegrove is a lawyer with the financial services group at Norton Rose LLP

COMMENT AND REACTION

Our Columnists

Hal Austin

Hal is editor of Financial Adviser and has been for more than a decade. He has previously worked on a number of local and national publications.

Ashley Wassall

Ashley is editor of FTAdviser and writes on all areas of retail finance. Previously supplements editor at Money Management and editor of a European private equity publication.

John Kenchington

John is editor of Investment Adviser and has written about investments for several years. He has worked at titles including City AM and was recently named in the MHP 30 To Watch list of up-and-coming media names.

Jon Cudby

Jon is editor of Money Management and has 12 years' experience covering retail personal finance. In 2005, Jon was launch editor of FTAdviser and most recently he was head of online content for Incisive Media's financial services titles.

Tony Hazell

Tony is a freelance financial journalist, having been editor of Money Mail at the Daily Mail for a number of years. He has been writing a column in Financial Adviser since 2005.

John Lappin

John is a weekly contributor to Investment Adviser with 15 years’ experience in financial journalism and 10 years writing on the IFA sector. He was formerly editor of an IFA trade magazine.

Most Popular
More on FTAdviser
FTA jobs