We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

Close
In association with

Home > Opinion > Simon Lovegrove

Striking a balance

Since the beginning of the financial crisis the financial sector has taken a battering and society’s confidence in the boards of financial firms, and in particular banks, has been significantly eroded.

By Simon Lovegrove | Published Jun 13, 2012 | comments

Since the beginning of the financial crisis the financial sector has taken a battering and society’s confidence in the boards of financial firms, and in particular banks, has been significantly eroded.

The lack of confidence has led to a number of initiatives concerning the delivery of effective corporate governance, notably the final recommendations of Sir David Walker in 2009, the amendments to the ‘combined code’ which led to the creation of the UK Corporate Governance Code in May 2010 and more recently the government publishing the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill which, if passed into law, includes provisions concerning executive pay reform.

At the heart of the corporate governance debate is a simple truism that unless managers within firms can take risks they will not generate returns. However, the chances of management making the right decisions are thought to be improved if they are supported by good corporate governance. This is a key point concerning the corporate governance debate in that the reforms introduced seek to reduce the risks of management making bad decisions but do not eliminate them entirely (hence why there are regulatory initiatives concerning the failure of a firm like recovery and resolution plans).

Completing the corporate governance structure is the framework that the regulator operates under. We have heard many times that the FSA has “radically” changed over the past five years, operating a more “intensive” approach to supervision which involves making forward-looking judgements about firms. Much has been written about the FSA’s ability to carry out this type of supervision with some in the market noting that this is still work in progress but matters have generally improved.

However, a further component of corporate governance lies outside the formal structure and relates to culture and ethics. In a speech published last month, Hector Sants encouraged firms to do more to give greater weight to non-financial metrics, particularly the fair treatment of customers, in determining an individual’s remuneration. The problem though is the markets’ constant focus on the next earnings announcement. Mr Sants rightly said that there is an important question that both regulators and society need to debate. Should all conduct and behaviour be driven by pure financial incentives or should there be some level of expectation that people leading financial services organisations be driven by the desire to “do the right thing”?

Should all conduct and behaviour be driven by pure financial incentives or should there be some expectation that people leading financial services organisations be driven by the desire to “do the right thing”?

Simon Lovegrove is a lawyer with the financial services group at Norton Rose LLP

More from Simon Lovegrove

COMMENT AND REACTION

Our Columnists

Emma Ann Hughes

Emma is editor of FTAdviser and has previously worked for Investment Adviser, Financial Adviser and edited Mortgage Adviser.

Jeff Prestridge

Jeff has been personal finance editor of the Mail on Sunday for a number of years. He writes on a range of subjects and has been a columnist at Financial Adviser since 2004.

Dan Jones

Dan is editor of Investment Adviser and has been a financial journalist for the past nine years. Most recently news editor of a retail fund management publication, he is a previous recipient of the Investment Association's Trade Journalist of the Year award.

Jon Cudby

Jon is editor of Money Management and has 12 years' experience covering retail personal finance. In 2005, Jon was launch editor of FTAdviser and most recently he was head of online content for Incisive Media's financial services titles.

Tony Hazell

Tony is a freelance financial journalist, having been editor of Money Mail at the Daily Mail for a number of years. He has been writing a column in Financial Adviser since 2005.

John Lappin

John is a weekly contributor to Investment Adviser with 15 years’ experience in financial journalism and 10 years writing on the IFA sector. He was formerly editor of an IFA trade magazine.

Most Popular
More on FTAdviser