We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

In association with

Home > Your Industry > Your Business

By Michael Trudeau | Published Jun 25, 2012

Two thirds of advisers prefer unbundled pricing, study

Advisers would strongly favour unbundled platform pricing models and ‘clean’ fund share classes post-Retail Distribution Review, research from self-invested pension and platform provider AJ Bell suggests.

In the wake of ongoing delays in the publication of the Financial Services Authority’s long-awaited final RDR platform rules, AJ Bell conducted a survey among 100 adviser firms to “test their appetite in bundled versus unbundled charging structures”.

It said that only 1 per cent of respondents favoured the bundled approach, while 62 per cent prefer unbundled pricing and 37 per cent said they are happy to use both.

On the subject of fund pricing, clean pricing, with 72 per cent opting for an approach where any rebate and platform fee is stripped out of the fund share price.

Billy Mackay, marketing director at A J Bell, said: “You can be sure that price will continue to play an important part in any platform due diligence process.

“Over the recent months, platform pricing has been a little bit like a game of cat and mouse with many firms announcing snippets of information about their future plans.

“Whilst the platforms seem unable to agree on the most appropriate approach to charging, these findings show that advisers are at one and clearly favour clean pricing.”

visible-status-Standard story-url-FTA ajbell MT 250612.xml

Most Popular
More on FTAdviser