We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

In association with

Home > Opinion > Jeff Prestridge

Forget RDR, IFAs must shout about the value of advice

Advisers and their representatives need to promote the fact that advice is worth paying for.

By Jeff Prestridge | Published Aug 01, 2012 | Regulation | comments

In little over five months’ time, when the glorious London Olympics’ opening ceremony is only a distant memory to be cherished for ever more, a new dawn will emerge for purveyors of that fine art called independent financial advice.

After much debate, argument and head scratching, the Retail Distribution Review will be enforced and the financial advice landscape will be a better place for it. Well, that is what we are being led to believe. Commissions will be replaced by fees, transparency, integrity and honesty will prevail and the general public will never have to doubt an adviser again. Advice utopia is just around the corner and everyone – the regulator, the adviser community and the general public – will be able to live happily ever after as if they are all starring parts in a Mills & Boon romantic novel.

Maybe we will get to this financial advice land of milk and honey but if industry experts are to be believed, it will not be without its big casualties – on both sides of the fence.

There is no doubt that a financial advice black hole will emerge as those advisers that survive concentrate on high net-worth individuals

Surveys still suggest that up to 30 per cent of financial advisers could give up the ghost before the RDR is finally embedded into the regulatory framework. Some advisers cannot see a viable business future post-RDR, others are in fear of taking exams after a long and distinguished career, while some will see the review as the final straw in a long line of final straws that have included onerous compensation levies and the outrageous castigating of advisers in the Arch Cru scandal by the FSA.

And there is no doubt that a financial advice black hole will emerge as those advisers that survive concentrate on high net-worth individuals, leaving many clients as ex-clients and disenfranchised from advice. Many of these consumers who disappear into the advice abyss will have no choice but to cling onto the coat tails of the Money Advice Service for their financial tidbits. Perish the thought.

To date, the game changer that is the RDR has rarely escaped the pages of the financial trade papers. Past editions of Financial Adviser have covered assiduously the consequences and implications of the review – and rightly so.

Yet the RDR has not really been an issue for national newspapers. Why? Because personal finance journalists like me prefer to write about things that the public can act upon immediately rather than about matters that are on a distant horizon. Indeed, we wrote about the value of financial advice in last week’s Financial Mail but never once referred to the RDR. We felt it would confuse our readers and be of no interest.

The regulator, the architect of the review, has also seemed reluctant to shout about it. Although it has published a flimsy consumer guide on the review, it is currently buried away deep in the bowels of its website.

Page 1 of 3


Our Columnists

Emma Ann Hughes

Emma is editor of FTAdviser and has previously worked for Investment Adviser, Financial Adviser and edited Mortgage Adviser.

Dan Jones

Dan is editor of Investment Adviser and has been a financial journalist for the past nine years. Most recently news editor of a retail fund management publication, he is a previous recipient of the Investment Association's Trade Journalist of the Year award.

Jon Cudby

Jon is editor of Money Management and has 12 years' experience covering retail personal finance. In 2005, Jon was launch editor of FTAdviser and most recently he was head of online content for Incisive Media's financial services titles.

Tony Hazell

Tony is a freelance financial journalist, having been editor of Money Mail at the Daily Mail for a number of years. He has been writing a column in Financial Adviser since 2005.

John Lappin

John is a weekly contributor to Investment Adviser with 15 years’ experience in financial journalism and 10 years writing on the IFA sector. He was formerly editor of an IFA trade magazine.

Most Popular
More on FTAdviser