We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

In association with

Home > Opinion > FTAdviser Blog > Marc Shoffman's blogs


Has the FSCS lost its marbles?

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme seems to have adopted a marbles-based approach to Keydata claims.

By Marc Shoffman | Published Sep 27, 2012 | comments

In my school days, a popular break time game was marbles. Having spent the weekend building up a collection of galaxies spots and stripes, I would enter the playground and compete to win more by hitting an opponent’s marble with mine.

There are two ways of playing this game. Either use your big marbles for a win against smaller ones, but risk losing your larger marbles, or compete for the big marbles with any size, but risk losing more.

At the end of break, you end up with a collection of lots of small marbles or a few big marbles. Ultimately, it is those with the big marbles that gain respect.

The removal of more than 100 names from the FSCS Keydata claims suggests that the FSCS would be the child going after all the small marbles. It has launched more than 600 claims related to Keydata sales and gradually that litigation is being reduced either through settlements or because the claim was incorrect.

Most of the settlements have been made with the company stating that they have no liability but just wanted to get rid of the claim.

The FSCS risks turning into the schoolboy who no-one wants to play marbles with any more as his marbles have no value. The small marbles can be colourful, but the big ones are more shiny and attractive, and arguably more valuable. Ultimately he loses respect and will have no-one to play with.

The FSCS needs respect if it wants other firms to comply in future claims and wants to be able to continue recouping funds.

The FSCS would gain more respect, and bigger marbles, by considering its claims rather than issuing blanket shots.


Our Columnists

Emma Ann Hughes

Emma is editor of FTAdviser and has previously worked for Investment Adviser, Financial Adviser and edited Mortgage Adviser.

Jeff Prestridge

Jeff has been personal finance editor of the Mail on Sunday for a number of years. He writes on a range of subjects and has been a columnist at Financial Adviser since 2004.

Dan Jones

Dan is editor of Investment Adviser and has been a financial journalist for the past nine years. Most recently news editor of a retail fund management publication, he is a previous recipient of the Investment Association's Trade Journalist of the Year award.

Jon Cudby

Jon is editor of Money Management and has 12 years' experience covering retail personal finance. In 2005, Jon was launch editor of FTAdviser and most recently he was head of online content for Incisive Media's financial services titles.

Tony Hazell

Tony is a freelance financial journalist, having been editor of Money Mail at the Daily Mail for a number of years. He has been writing a column in Financial Adviser since 2005.

John Lappin

John is a weekly contributor to Investment Adviser with 15 years’ experience in financial journalism and 10 years writing on the IFA sector. He was formerly editor of an IFA trade magazine.

Most Popular
More on FTAdviser