We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

In association with

Home > Opinion > FTAdviser Blog > Donia O'Loughlin's blogs


Why has Capita got off light over Arch Cru?

The FSA’s three enforcement actions against Arch smacks of hypocrisy and seems to show favoritism.

By Donia O'Loughlin | Published Dec 20, 2012 | comments

On Tuesday the Financial Services Authority issued decision notices against Arch Financial Products, its chief executive Robin Farrell and its former compliance director Robert Addison for their role in the Arch Cru debacle.

The enforcement actions, all of which are being contested in the Upper Tribunal, saw Mr Farrell and Mr Addison hit with fines totalling £850,000. Arch would have received a £9m fine if it had the funds to pay it, but it doesn’t.

The FSA is correct in its assertion that Arch could not pay this fine. It has total assets of £46,000, or at least it did when I interviewed Mr Farrell in April.

Capita Financial Managers, the authorised corporate director of the Arch Cru funds, was also censured by the FSA in recent weeks. It similarly escaped a £4m fine as it does not have the funds to pay it.

Again, this at first seems a fair assertion. According to its annual report, in 2011 CFM made a profit of £206,377.

However, its ‘ultimate parent company’ (the FSA’s words, not mine) Capita plc made a profit of £385.2m in 2011.

In CFM’s final notice, issued on 26 November, the regulator highlighted that Capita plc contributed heavily to the voluntary £32m provided to the £54m redress package for consumers as further justification for waiving its fine.

Even if the parent provided the entire sum, this equates to less than 10 per cent of its underlying profit.

Moreover, if the parent company is stepping in to cover the costs of this redress package contribution, why could it not also have covered any FSA fines levied against its subsidiary? It would have been a small drop in the ocean for them.

This is especially pertinent in the week the FSA has confirmed it is going to hit advisers with a redress scheme covering investor losses of up to £141m. It estimates that £20-£40m may eventually be paid by intermediaries that advised on Arch Cru.

The fine waiver for CFM smacks of hypocrisy. Worse, Chris Addenbrooke, CFM’s chief executive, is not even mentioned in the final notice.

As chief executive, he has two controlled functions: CF1 and CF3. The latter of these means that he has responsibility for the whole of the business, which surely must mean the company’s actions in relation to Arch Cru - which are severe enough to warrant public censure - are effectively his too?

One has to ask if it is fair that the Arch directors were fined for their wrongdoing, while executives from other parties that have also been found to have failed in their duties have not.

Now of course the two companies respective failings are not the same, but it seems to me that there are some striking similarities.

Arch’s decision notice also talks about conflict of interest that Arch had. However, in the Capita final notice the FSA does not mention that Hugh Aldous, the chairman of the current manager of the Arch Cru Guernsey cells SPL (which is driving litigation action that lays much of the primary blame for the funds’ failure squarely at the door of Arch), is also chairman of Capita Sinclair Henderson, a subsidiary of Capita which provides fund accounting, company secretarial and administration services.

Page 1 of 2


Our Columnists

Emma Ann Hughes

Emma is editor of FTAdviser and has previously worked for Investment Adviser, Financial Adviser and edited Mortgage Adviser.

Jeff Prestridge

Jeff has been personal finance editor of the Mail on Sunday for a number of years. He writes on a range of subjects and has been a columnist at Financial Adviser since 2004.

Dan Jones

Dan is editor of Investment Adviser and has been a financial journalist for the past nine years. Most recently news editor of a retail fund management publication, he is a previous recipient of the Investment Association's Trade Journalist of the Year award.

Jon Cudby

Jon is editor of Money Management and has 12 years' experience covering retail personal finance. In 2005, Jon was launch editor of FTAdviser and most recently he was head of online content for Incisive Media's financial services titles.

Tony Hazell

Tony is a freelance financial journalist, having been editor of Money Mail at the Daily Mail for a number of years. He has been writing a column in Financial Adviser since 2005.

John Lappin

John is a weekly contributor to Investment Adviser with 15 years’ experience in financial journalism and 10 years writing on the IFA sector. He was formerly editor of an IFA trade magazine.

Most Popular
More on FTAdviser