RegulationJan 31 2014

FCA fines State Street £23m for concealing charges

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by

The Financial Conduct Authority has fined State Street UK £22.8m for executing a “deliberate” strategy to charge clients substantial mark-ups on certain transitions, in addition to the agreed management fee or commissions, which were not agreed by clients and were “concealed” from them.

The fine relates to the ‘transitions management’ (TM) business, which is a service provided to clients to support structural changes to asset portfolios with the intention of managing risk and increasing returns.

The FCA found, between June 2010 and September 2011, that State Street’s TM business “deliberately overcharged” six clients a total of $20,169,603 (£12.3m).

State Street UK’s clients include large investment management firms and pension funds holding the funds and savings of retail investors.

The systemic weaknesses in State Street UK’s business practices and control environment around the UK TM business were “so serious that the overcharging only came to light after a client notified staff that it had identified mark-ups on certain trades that had not been agreed”, the watchdog said.

The FCA said those responsible then “incorrectly claimed” both to the client and later to State Street UK’s compliance department that the charging was an inadvertent error, and arranged for a substantial rebate to be paid on that false basis.

They then “deliberately failed to disclose the existence of further mark-ups on other trades conducted as part of the same transition”.

The FCA said it views the State Street UK’s failings to be at “the most serious end of the spectrum” as State Street UK acted as an agent to its TM clients and “held itself out as being a trusted advisor”.

Accordingly, it breached a position of trust, the FCA said. Further, the FCA found the overcharging accounted for over a quarter of its TM revenue.

The FCA said the company has breached three of the FCA’s principles of business: it failed to treat its customers fairly; it failed to communicate with clients in a way that was clear, fair and not misleading; and it failed to take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly, with adequate risk systems.

However, the regulator said once senior management became aware of the issue State Street UK took action to investigate the misconduct and to implement a comprehensive programme to improve the UK TM business controls and bolster control functions, governance and culture across its UK businesses.

Tracey McDermott, director of enforcement and financial crime, said: “State Street UK allowed a culture to develop in the UK TM business which prioritised revenue generation over the interests of its customers.

“State Street UK’s significant failings in culture and controls allowed deliberate overcharging to take place and to continue undetected. Their conduct has fallen far short of our expectations. Firms should be in no doubt that the spotlight will remain on wholesale conduct.”

State Street UK agreed to settle at an early stage of the FCA’s investigation and has therefore qualified for a 30 per cent discount. Were it not for this discount, the FCA would have imposed a financial penalty of £32,692,800 on State Street UK.