Balancing act

Funds in the IMA's Balanced Managed sector are permitted to have up to 85 per cent in equities, making the sector name something of a misnomer.

Advertising

The impact of this can be clearly seen by looking at performance. The FTSE All-Share ex-Investment Trust lost 16.30 per cent from 1 July 2007 to 31 July 2008, and only a handful of sector offerings suffered larger drops in the period.

Fair enough, balanced funds should lose less given that they're not all equity and given that the All-Share came into the crisis with a heavy financial services weight. In other words, it was an easy benchmark for a multi-asset fund to beat in the downturn.

If we take two truly balanced strategies and compare them to the sector, a different picture emerges. A composite index made up of 50 per cent MSCI World and 50 per cent Lehman Sterling Aggregate Bond would have lost 3.3 percentage points in the above-referenced period. If we replace MSCI World with the All-Share in the composite, the loss still would have been a mild 5.8 percentage points. Although they would have failed to compete strongly in up markets, both strategies would have performed in the top quintile of the sector over the period, suggesting at the very least that most managers in the group failed to move to protect assets in the downturn.

Within this group, it won't be surprising that we think Jupiter Merlin Balanced is one of the better options going. John Chatfeild Roberts and his team have done a nice job of participating in up markets while limiting the fund's downside. The fund is down just 2.98 percentage points over the past year, compared to a 5.53 per cent loss for its average sector peer. At last count, it was roughly 44 per cent cash and fixed interest, with the remainder in equities. It can and has been more aggressive, but when it counts, the team have made the right decisions. As with most unfettered funds of funds, you are paying a premium for the privilege, but at least here you're getting experienced managers with proven expertise for your money.

For those not interested in paying up for a fund of funds, we also think Newton Balanced merits serious consideration. It has been heavily equity oriented at various times, but we continue to think highly of Newton's global analyst staff and their thematic approach to investing. That group made two big calls that have paid off dramatically across Newton's fund range in the past two years - cutting financials exposure, and increasing the emphasis on large caps. This fund already had a large-cap emphasis, so it benefited less from the latter, but the move away from financials helped it considerably – indeed, it lost just 1.1 percentage points from 1 July 2007 to 31 July 2008. The fund has not always been a standout, but we think Newton's research and sensible approach both argue in its favour over the long term.

FTAdviser BLOGS RSS

Latest Post  

Another adviser roller coaster in 2009?

The year 2008 was a rodeo for IFAs. As well as dealing with the affects of the credit crun... read more

SIGN UP TO NEWS ALERTS




FTAdviser  Jobs  RSS