Multi-managerMay 20 2013

What to look for when selecting a fund of funds?

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by

Having grown 43% in the last five years (Lipper March 2013), the investment universe is now home to circa 200 multi-manager funds. This number implies that there’s a huge amount of choice, but when profiling the funds on basic attributes, most appear to offer a similar deal.

Each fund is typically risk graded by external risk consultancy firms, such as Distribution Technology. As risk ratings are based on asset allocation and not just volatility, the funds tend to invest in the same asset classes – with often remarkably similar percentage exposures to each. Pricing is also similar, with an average ongoing charge of 1.93% in the market and little spread either side of that figure.

Not surprisingly, performance differentiation also becomes much narrower. Amongst the fund of funds risk rated 5 by Distribution Technology over the last three years, there has been less than a 6%* spread in performance against the average, compared to 31.2%* in the wider IMA Mixed 20% - 60% Shares sector.

Digging deeper can paint a more accurate picture

Beyond the generic fund profile there are, however, many differentiating factors that could help you separate the wheat from the chaff, and the core attributes for performance delivery are focused on the investment processes and research capabilities of the fund provider.

Strong asset allocation is key. Actively managed portfolios with short-term allocation shifts can bridge the gap between long-term assumptions and current market conditions, while bottom-up stock selection can help identify opportunities beyond the plain vanilla.

Behind a comprehensive stock selection process there must be a strong research and asset allocation team. How big is the research team? What analysis is used? Does the team have industry recognition and solid experience? Does the fund rely on one star manager? These are all questions that should be asked. For example, consider the continuity of a team based approach against the risk of a single star manager leaving the fund. Risk controls should also be investigated. Investment managers use different, proprietary tools to calculate risk and have varying fund analysis processes. Understanding the systems used and how deeply embedded they are into every aspect of the business can help profile a fund more accurately, rather than simple reliance upon a risk rating.

On the issue of risk, assessing the capital adequacy of the investment provider is also crucial. When investing for a client, a company with a fortress balance sheet offers more guarantee of longevity and more peace of mind.

All of this information should be transparent and easily accessible from the investment providers. In fact, many sell their funds on these credentials.

You have a choice, put it to good use

If you are considering using a fund of funds, there is plenty of choice in the market, but while the packaging might often look the same, the palette from which the fund managers paint can make all the difference. Recent performance is undeniably similar across the board, but whether a fund can deliver its objective over the long term and survive varying market conditions can only be determined accurately by looking at the process and team behind it.

Jamie Farquhar is Head of Sales for J.P. Morgan Adviser Solutions

For further information on the J.P. Morgan Fusion fund of funds range, visit jpmorgan.co.uk/fusionfunds or call 0800 727 770

*Financial Express to 28/3/2013

For Professional Clients only – not for Retail use or distribution.

This document has been produced for information purposes only and as such the views contained herein are not to be taken as an advice or recommendation to buy or sell any investment or interest thereto. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Any research in this document has been obtained and may have been acted upon by J.P. Morgan Asset Management for its own purpose. The results of such research are being made available as additional information and do not necessarily reflect the views of J.P.Morgan Asset Management. Any forecasts, figures, opinions, statements of financial market trends or investment techniques and strategies expressed are unless otherwise stated, J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s own at the date of this document. They are considered to be reliable at the time of writing, may not necessarily be all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. They may be subject to change without reference or notification to you. Both past performance and yield may not be a reliable guide to future performance and you should be aware that the value of securities and any income arising from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions. There is no guarantee that any forecast made will come to pass.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co and its affiliates worldwide. You should note that if you contact J.P. Morgan Asset Management by telephone those lines may be recorded and monitored for legal, security and training purposes. You should also take note that information and data from communications with you will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with the EMEA Privacy Policy which can be accessed through the following website http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/privacy.

Issued in the UK by JPMorgan Asset Management Marketing Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England No. 01161446. Registered address: 25 Bank St, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP, United Kingdom.