PlatformsOct 14 2013

The pressure is on platform providers

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by

There’s no doubt about it; advisers are under pressure to prove their worth. With so much focus on transparency, value for money and whole-of-market advice, advisers are constantly on the look-out for the best solutions for their clients.

A report by Deloitte earlier this year estimated that the value of platforms is to grow from around the £200bn mark to £600bn by 2018. However, to expect constant droves of advisers to turn to platforms as has been the recent trend may be a touch unrealistic. Many advisers have already moved a large part of their business onto platforms amid a boost in their popularity, so the number of new advisers available to do so going forwards will naturally slow.

Of course, there are some new initiatives such as non-advised sales using platform technology which are starting to gain some business, but the vast majority continues to be from advised sales.

As such, there’s more onus than ever on boosting assets under administration through business retention and attracting business from others, especially at a time when re-registration is becoming more widely acknowledged, better understood and crucially, easier to achieve.

Future growth in platform use will be guided by the quality of platform product offering. With more than 30 platforms currently available in the market, there is little doubt that the competition is stiff and platform providers will need to up their game if they wish to ensure that business comes their way.

Unsurprisingly, cost is right up there but it can be somewhat of a minefield to manoeuvre, with some platforms almost reverting back to the days of insurance company charges with a small charge here and a little charge there and everything starting to get lost in the small print. Advisers seeking to choose a platform should know exactly what level of involvement they want – are funds likely to be rebalanced regularly or switched to use capital gains tax allowance? This will certainly affect the charges levied by some platforms.

In addition, advisers are undoubtedly on the lookout for technology and the ease of use. The basics have to be there, such as client valuations and various reports including capital gains trust and cash histories but some of the other “technology” in place is simply dressing up the fact that the adviser is doing the work that was previously performed by the platform itself.

There is a real division over the tools offered by all the different platforms and advisers will want to ensure they pick the right platform for their clients’ needs. Some platforms offer their own risk profiler and asset allocations which can influence the funds chosen, whereas there are others that have shied away from this and would prefer their advisers to use independent tools and research. Platforms looking for greater market share need to identify their target audience and know what they need to trump their competition.

Building up a solid reputation and demonstrating financial stability certainly helps to trump your competitors; advisers want to know that they are placing their business in safe hands and work with a provider they have confidence in.

Creating a solid reputation in the financial services industry often comes from offering unrivalled service and this ultimately remains a top priority, both for the client and the adviser. Making sure that users talk to people who know what they are doing and understand their needs is crucial. When choosing a platform, advisers want peace of mind that if something administrative goes wrong, it can be fixed quickly and without a fuss.

With the spotlight continue to glare down on the financial services industry, platform providers have to be able to keep up with market developments, legislation and the changing needs of advisers. They also need to ensure they offer the best products, services and fees in order to keep their clients happy and coming back.

This competition will only hot up as advisers increasingly become aware of what to expect from their platform provider.

Harry Kerr is director at Avalon Investment Services

PLATFORM MARKET IS EVOLVING AS COST DEBATE TAKES CENTRE STAGE

Major platforms: ‘We will secure same prices as Standard Life’

Fund platforms have labelled Standard Life’s revelation of fund groups providing them with discounted fees as a “damp squib” as they insist they will get the same deals.

Adviser charging rift in platform sector

Four platforms – including Cofunds, Skandia, FundsNetwork and Axa Elevate – have now stated they will keep paying trail and rebates from investments made before December 31 2012.

In contrast Ascentric, Novia, Alliance Trust Savings and Standard Life have all begun converting share classes in bulk with a view to moving their entire suite of funds on to clean fee share classes within the next few months.

Cutting trail ‘will destroy adviser businesses’

PanaceaAdviser chief executive Derek Bradley (pictured, left) has warned platforms seeking to convert investors to clean fee share classes that they could wipe out “a huge chunk of value” from adviser businesses.

Nucleus to assess pricing before converting shares

The full cost of funds’ share classes should dictate whether bulk conversion to unbundled shares is appropriate, according to Nucleus chief executive David Ferguson.