Five key issues which should frame your vote

Search sponsored by
Five key issues which should frame your vote

News websites have tended to avoid ‘leader’ columns giving a single, uniting view. Compared to our paper peers we are more ethereal and our readers transient.

But with an election looming it is traditional for news publications with a political purview, however limited, to give an informed view on how one might wish to vote.

In light of these competing conventions, FTAdviser has decided not to give a voting recommendation. Instead we present here five key issues that face the country today, with a bias towards the key areas of interest: individual financial wellbeing and the economy.

Few if any of the parties have provided any real answers to the challenges listed below, although some have policies that offer some form of response at least dealing with the lowest-hanging fruit.

Readers will by now be familar with manifesto commitments and other pledges. FTAdviser believes whichever parties are in power after 7 May must address the issues set out below and contribute to more comprehensive longer-term solutions.

Whichever has your confidence in these critical areas, should get your vote on Thursday.

1. Living within our means.

The UK is severely overdrawn and spends excessively.

As a nation we spent £87.3bn more than we earned the last financial year and under the coalition’s plans we will spend £75bn more than we earn in the current year. This means last year spending was more than 13 per cent higher than income and next it will be 11 per cent.

Imagine you earn £50,000 a year: you’d have borrowed £6,700 last year and will borrow £5,750 in the next 12 months. You’d be adding all of this to debts of around £100,000 that you’ve already amassed.

This is plainly not prudent. We are spending £53bn a year and rising servicing debt, which is significantly more than the defence budget, more than half of the education budget and more than a third of the health budget.

2. Spending cuts and ‘fairness’.

Restoring the public finances to health was the stated goal of the coalition when it came to power. Despite having missed its original targets, it has pursued the so-called ‘austerity’ agenda and cut the budget deficit by around a third in real terms.

There has been much criticism of where the scythe has fallen, with statistics showing the poor being disproportionately hit. Of course, that was the plan due to a range of measures to limit spending on benefits which broadly commanded popular support.