Your IndustryMar 2 2016

IFAs should ‘become a profession’: Labour

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
IFAs should ‘become a profession’: Labour

The Independent Review of Retirement Income recommended that financial advisers should undertake a review of their industry to address a number of issues.

First, the report wants improvement and a formalising of the professional standards of advisers, including training – despite the fact the Retail Distribution Review (RDR) introduced such requirements back at the start of 2013.

Second, the Labour party-funded report produced by David Blake, director of the Pensions Institute, called for the introduction of a fiduciary standard for financial advisers who provide full regulated advice.

Third, the report called for “appropriate charging models” for the service offered with a clear demonstration that the charges deliver value for money to the customer and with full transparency over charges.

The RDR introduced requirements for customer-agreed remuneration for advisers more than three years ago.

The report stated: “Financial advisers are not a recognised profession, yet they wish to provide advice on billions of pounds of UK retirement savings.

“Further, research by the FCA shows that customers are put off seeking financial advice because they are unable to trust the advice they receive or judge its quality.”

It added that the “obvious solution” was to transform themselves into a recognised profession.

The report also called on the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to review its multiple definitions on guidance and advice with a view to creating a hybrid form of advice.

It stated that the FCA should replace all other categories with just two: personal recommendation and a category which sits in the middle of this and execution-only – financial help.

Financial help, in this context, would replace everything that was not fully regulated fee-based advice where the adviser took responsibility for the personal recommendation.

The report’s summary stated: “There has to be a middle way between guidance and regulated advice.

“Many people’s pots are just not big enough, and their financial circumstances are just not complicated enough to warrant full regulated advice.”

The report also raised the issue of a safe harbour for financial advisers.

Although safe harbour products are available in the US and Australia, the FCA has refused to grant safe harbour to any UK investments.

The report recommended regulators agree a set of criteria for granting safe harbour status to key retirement income products.

“Providers and advisers could not subsequently be sued for offering or recommending a safe harbour product, having first determined its suitability for a client as part of a safe harbour retirement income solution,” the report’s summary stated.

Adviser View

Tom McPhail, head of retirement policy at Bristol-based Hargreaves Lansdown, said: “The review calls for a combination of measures to help retiring investors, including guided decision pathways, safe harbour products and a national narrative on retirement planning led by an independent pension commission.

“A safe harbour product of the kind described in this report may not be any more achievable than a perpetual motion machine.

“The products available today are largely fit for purpose already. The challenge is rather to make sure that investors are helped to engage at a level which works for them and to make good decisions, even if that is simply to buy an annuity.”

KEY FACTS

Labour-funded report stated “simplest solution” involves only three routes:

• execution-only – the customer makes all the decisions (‘I want to do it myself’).

• ‘financial help’ – the customer is helped or steered towards tailored options using a decision tree, but this is currently classified as advice (‘help me do it’).

• personal recommendation or full regulated advice (‘do it for me’)

ruth.gillbe@ft.com