OpinionJul 5 2016

Human touch, robo-eye

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
comment-speech

Robo-investing and robo-advice are on the verge of a major breakthrough in the UK.

Consulting firm A.T. Kearney estimates the rapidly-expanding sector is set to grow 68 per cent annually, and could be worth $2.2 trillion globally by 2020.

Around half of this is expected to come from assets already invested with traditional managers, which is why big brands are looking to get in on the act – Investec Wealth, Brewin Dolphin, Hargreaves Lansdown and Barclays are all believed to be launching robo services in the UK this year. And they are not likely to be the only ones.

‘Robo’ has been adopted as a loose, catch-all term for removing humans from various parts of the investment process and replacing them with automation, algorithms and slick digital platforms.

It covers a spectrum of different models, from robo-advice, which recommends investment based on information about lifestyle, goals, risk levels and savings, to robo-investing, which usually refers to cases where algorithms select and potentially trade a portfolio on someone’s behalf.

There is every reason to welcome this concept, not as a fad, but as a viable, mainstream investing channel for everyone.

Humans are prone to bias, panic and emotional decision-making, all of which can spell disaster for a portfolio Richard Theo

Why? Because the vast majority of ordinary savers are priced-out of traditional wealth management services, their cash rotting away in high street accounts earning record low interest rates averaging 0.25 per cent a year.

In short, there’s a desperate need to make investing easy and convenient, to help the typical saver to grow their money and shore up their financial future.

And with a quarter of Britons having less than £3,000 saved (according to data from Wealthify) the solution must also be low cost and affordable for the mass market who aren’t willing to pay £150* per hour for financial advice.

Robo-investing, with its far cheaper operating model holds great promise as a way to achieve this overdue democratisation of savings and investments.

But it’s not just cost that is driving accessibility. Robo changes how people access investment services.

Anyone, anywhere with an internet connection can sign up and start investing in minutes, check their investments and withdraw them any time they like.

It’s exactly this kind of instant, agile service that appeals to the younger generation, and it’s leaving many banks and traditional providers scratching their heads as they try to work out how to compete.

Robo appeals to the iPhone generation – those accustomed to polished online services – and crucially, to those who aren’t wedded to the big, and in some cases damaged, financial brands.

So robo ticks a number of boxes, and certainly machines are a lot better than humans at some tasks. But even so, the question is will people be comfortable handing over their money to a machine?

Being successful in today’s complex financial markets is a matter of processing and analysing tremendous amounts of data as quickly as possible – a task to which computers, with their superior precision and computational power are perfectly suited.

Successful investing also requires discipline and consistency; humans are prone to bias, panic and emotional decision-making, all of which can spell disaster for a portfolio. Many of today’s top institutional investors know this and are increasingly adopting algorithms and automation to avoid losing competitive edge.

Across financial services, technology is taking centre-stage, driving huge improvements in customer experience, security, risk management and operational efficiency.

But, when it comes to money, savers will need reassurance that their life savings aren’t totally at the mercy of an equation and the success of robo may ultimately depend on there being the right balance of human and machine.

Technology may take the starring role, but there’s a comfort in knowing humans are there in the background, designing, building, and tweaking the algorithms, and ultimately keeping a watchful, reassuringly human eye on the money.

So, in short, the future of robo looks bright, as long as it’s a blend of artificial and human intelligence.

And if the industry meets its phenomenal growth potential, robots could become the servants of human-kind, financially at least, a lot sooner than we think.

Richard Theo is chief executive of Wealthify