Defined BenefitNov 8 2017

The temptations of DB transfers

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
The temptations of DB transfers

Although there is no doubt that pension freedoms has created the incentive to transfer out of DB schemes to access retirement income early – and without the scheme’s actuarial reduction factors – there are several influences working together to accelerate the number of DB transfer requests coming through. If you are wondering about the volumes, DB transfers increased by more than 50 per cent over the past 12 months alone, according to Royal London.

The Pensions Regulator has estimated that more than 80,000 DB transfers were completed in the past year. 

Firstly, DB transfer values are rising fast. According to the Xafinity Transfer Value Index they are increasing by between 3 per cent to 3.5 per cent per month at the moment. Average transfer values, according to Royal London, are 25 to 30 times the value of the annual pension the DB pension promised by way of an annuity. The difficulty of finding the financial advice required to complete a transfer of more than £30,000 led the head of The Pensions Advisory Service, Michelle Cracknell, to declare “market failure”. In many cases, those who are requesting transfer valuations are all too likely to be blinded by their own personal ‘ka-ching’ moment before they get professional help.

Key points

  • There has been unease at the numbers of DB transfer requests. 
  • A frequently cited reason is the much more generous death benefits. 
  • There is also some evidence of a skills shortage among the adviser community.

Reasons for the rise

Why are valuations rising so fast? Actuarial regulations require that the transfer value must reflect the potential growth rates of the scheme’s assets and, as trustees have fled to ultra-safe – and ultra-low return – assets, we have seen transfer values soar. Meanwhile, the accounting standards that drive how DB deficits are reported in company accounts are so pessimistic that even after paying out these huge transfer values, employers see an apparent reduction in their deficit as members leave. Many DB schemes have closed to entrants and at the moment only 11 FTSE-250 companies still provide DB benefits to a substantial number of employees, according to research by JLT Employee Benefits.

The sums on offer are now so mind-bogglingly large that many members believe they will not be able to spend all the cash in their retirement lifespan. A frequently cited reason for taking these large transfer values is the much more generous death benefits that can be achieved within a Sipp. Instead of a DB pension that dies with the member, or reduces by 50 per cent before paying a spouse’s pension, taking a transfer value opens the possibility of leaving all the unused pension pot tax free to the spouse, children or grandchildren. 

 

FCA consultation paper

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) just closed consultation on consultation paper (CP) 17/16, which is shaping a new, supposedly more modern system for advising on DB pension transfers. The proposed Appropriate Pensions Transfer Analysis (APTA) system seeks to properly compare the accrued benefits being given up by a DB member planning to transfer out, with what they might get in DC. 

APTA could be supported by a prescribed comparison tool to be called Transfer Value Comparison (TVC), which will calculate the cost of buying equivalent benefits in the new DC scheme that members have elected to transfer out to (see graph above). 

At first sight you might think this will put people off transferring. The message is that if you invest your transfer value prudently and then buy an annuity at retirement you will be £20,000 worse off than if you had stayed in the DB scheme. However, I think it will do little to deter people, as many transferees are saying: “I won’t be buying one of those expensive annuities.”

It is also likely to become less onerous to complete transfers in the next year or so. There are moves afoot to streamline the DB transfer process to reduce the average 33 weeks it takes to complete the process today, to as little as 48-hours, if the transfers and Re-registration Industry Group standards thinking is adopted. 

 

Process issues

It is clear if you read the Origo white paper, ominously entitled The Troubles with DB Transfers, that there are lots of “process issues” preventing rapid transfers right now. These can be summarised as a lack of standards for data capture and transfer between parties and lack of automation and connectedness between all parties involved. But if increasing volumes of members lose out as a result of process delays, we should expect the Ombudsman to take an unforgiving attitude towards those responsible.

In addition, there is also some evidence of a skills shortage among the adviser community as Origo uncovered in its in-depth discussions with a wide cross-section of third party administrators and employee benefits consultants handling a rising number of DB transfer requests. 

That said, a new DB pensions transfer specialist qualification, launched by the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) in July and also now offered by The Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment, should help. 

It is not just the number of members transferring out that is likely to get IFAs to sit up and think, but the fact that anyone wanting DB transfers that exceed £30,000 must obtain advice from a regulated adviser, as stipulated in the Pension Schemes Act 2015, before the transfer value can be paid across. As the valuation multiples continue to increase, an increasing number of transfers will go north of this threshold.

 

Laws of physics

As Isaac Newton discovered, what goes up must eventually come down. But when we do get to the point that DB transfer values start to edge down, that tipping point will only drive a further increase in volumes as people scramble to get out before the current transfer golden age comes to an end.

Indeed, the Xafinity Transfer Value Index, which tracks the transfer value that would be provided by an example DB scheme to a member aged 64 who is currently entitled to a pension of £10,000 each year starting at age 65 (increasing each year in line with inflation), indicates most values are well above the FCA’s threshold – Xafinity’s index stood at £237,000 last month. 

IFAs should also have half an eye on a potential spike in demand for DB transfers once the Pensions Dashboard goes live in 2019. 

Most people agree that seeing different pots all in one place online will lead to an increased demand for consolidation of pension pots and, once people reach age 55, increased DB to DC transfers. The trick will be responding to inevitably increasing demand for greater flexibility, without jeopardising clients’ and their dependants’ retirement income prospects.

Adrian Boulding is director of retirement strategy for Dunstan Thomas