A family sitting together
Paid post by Octopus Investments

IHT planning when there is a Power of Attorney

Here’s one way to help a couple stay in their home while planning for IHT

Estate planning can sometimes be tricky when there’s a power of attorney in place. Any decisions made by the attorney need to be in the best interest of the donor on whose behalf they’re acting. As always, appropriate options depend on the donor’s circumstances and wishes, but lifetime gifting and settling assets into trust can be difficult.

However, making an investment that qualifies for Business Property Relief (BPR) can be a solution for donors who expressed wishes to plan for their estate. That’s because a BPR-qualifying investment stays in the donor’s name, meaning they can access the capital later on if it’s needed.

The following scenario, inspired by a case dealt with by an adviser we work with, illustrates how a BPR-qualifying investment can help clients achieve estate planning objectives when there’s a power of attorney in place.

Meet Barbara and Malcolm

Barbara and Malcolm are 88 and 90 respectively. Both have lost capacity, and a lasting power of attorney is in place for their financial affairs, with their grandson Tom acting as attorney. Tom wants to help Barbara and Malcolm stay in their home, where they receive at-home care. Although expensive, the cost of this care is being met by income from Barbara and Malcolm’s pensions. Tom is keen for them to have access to the remainder of their wealth should it be needed in the future to maintain their quality of care.

As well as wanting to help his grandparents continue to fulfil their wish to stay in their home, Tom is also mindful of inheritance tax, and the fact that Barbara and Malcolm have expressed the desire to leave as much as they can to their great-grandchildren – Tom’s children, nieces and nephews.

Tom meets with Barbara and Malcolm’s adviser, Christine, to discuss what options are available. All told, the couple’s estate is worth £1.8 million, and Tom is keen to fulfil their wishes to reduce the inheritance tax liability.

Although Christine explains that Barbara and Malcom’s ongoing needs are expected to be met from their income, Tom is not keen to make gifts from their estate in case they need access to incremental funds in the future. While at-home care costs are currently covered, there’s uncertainty around how long they will need to be paid, and what other needs Barbara or Malcolm may have down the line.

That said, Christine also acknowledges that leaving as much wealth as possible to their great-grandchildren is another important objective the couple had. She suggests moving some of the couple’s existing investments into an investment that qualifies for Business Property Relief (BPR) from inheritance tax. This, she explains, would take the form of a managed portfolio of shares that can be passed on free from inheritance tax, provided they have been held for at least two years when Barbara and Malcom die.