What is behind the evolution of managed portfolio services?

  • List what MPS is and what have been the main drivers of the evolution of MPS.
  • Describe what impact the platform approach has had and increased transparency.
  • Identify how MPS solutions might develop and what impact new entrants will have.
  • List what MPS is and what have been the main drivers of the evolution of MPS.
  • Describe what impact the platform approach has had and increased transparency.
  • Identify how MPS solutions might develop and what impact new entrants will have.
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
What is behind the evolution of managed portfolio services?

With platform investment minimums starting from as low as £1,000, this has given advisers and their clients unprecedented access to discretionary solutions previously out of reach. 

Transparency is the key

Fast forward a couple of years and we are in the age of transparency.

When Defaqto started collecting data, not only were many DFMs reluctant to reveal their charging structure but they genuinely could not comprehend why we, and by inference advisers, would want to know.

While most DFMs are now fairly clear on the costs associated with their MPS solutions, there is still a little way to go before full compliance with Mifid ll is achieved.

But MPS solutions can, in the main, be compared on a like-for-like basis with their peers as well as fund of fund alternatives. 

Access to information, from charges through to asset allocation, means that other comparisons can be made.

Risk rating portfolios for instance, means that advisers can much more easily incorporate MPS selection into their workflows.

There is a temptation to greet all new regulation with resistance and cynicism, but for advisers previously suspicious of the opaque nature of DFM charging this represents phenomenal progress, and sends a clear message to the investment community that DFMs have arrived and are here to stay.

Spoilt for choice

The final guidance (FG 12/16) was issued in July 2012 and included the following actions for firms conducting replacement business: 

  • consider the needs and objectives of its target clients when designing or adopting a central investment proposition (CIP);
  • ensure that it is not ‘shoe-horning’ clients into the CIP.

In a nutshell this basically means the ‘one size fits all’ approach is not good enough.

In response to this, the scope of MPS solutions has broadened significantly as DFMs have taken on more clients and increased assets under management. 

The average number of portfolios available through each MPS solution now stands at 10. In addition, ranges have expanded beyond the standard low, medium and high risk. We now see ranges more granular in terms of risk, allowing more targeted judgements on suitability from advisers. 

Advisers can now expect to see income and growth ranges and perhaps even a passive range too.

Of the 142 MPS solutions Defaqto collects data on, 11 are classified as entirely passive, with a further 31 offering passive as well as active strategies. We expect the choice of portfolios to continue to grow.

Doing the right thing 

Ethical and environmental, social and governance (ESG) strategies seem to be gaining traction, and are looking to throw off the ‘niche’ label.

PAGE 3 OF 4