EconomyJan 14 2019

How to navigate political and economic risks in 2019

  • Describe what political and economic predictions were made in 2018 and if they came true.
  • List what is next for the global economy this year and how policymakers will influence it.
  • Identify how investors can respond to economic risks and which asset classes might offer diversification.
  • Describe what political and economic predictions were made in 2018 and if they came true.
  • List what is next for the global economy this year and how policymakers will influence it.
  • Identify how investors can respond to economic risks and which asset classes might offer diversification.
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
How to navigate political and economic risks in 2019

The beginning of a new year provides the customary juncture for both reflection and prediction. 

This time last January, Heartwood Investment Management made its economic and investment predictions for 2018 and beyond, and now investors once again look to the future.

But before we look ahead, it may be worth reviewing our track record for the year behind us.

For example, last January, Heartwood IM correctly suggested a global recession was unlikely in 2018. This may have seemed an obvious statement, but at the time plenty of commentators were highlighting the long length of the current global economic expansion.

Heartwood did say the current cycle would likely change shape, and so it has proved, with a shift away from central bank support to government stimulus.

We also predicted that business investment in developed economies would rise, which it did, although it is far too soon to say whether productivity has been lifted as a result.

The march higher in US interest rates, global bond yields and the US dollar have indeed conspired to restrain global financial conditions, thus challenging investor sentiment.

In China, Heartwood IM underestimated the damage that prior deleveraging efforts would do to economic activity. Some of the weakness in China and emerging markets is, of course, due to US import tariffs – not a risk that was fully envisioned in 2017.

Indeed, protectionist threats and actions have been the single most important negative surprise in 2018.

Another theme identified last January was a rise in inflationary pressures, which were uneven across the major economies, but most pronounced in the US.

Where it was felt inflation would not accelerate was in the UK, and indeed we have seen UK inflation fall, albeit only marginally.

However, the yields on UK government bonds have not fallen in tandem, rather they have responded to rate hikes from the Bank of England (in November 2017 and August 2018), as well as being dragged higher by other bond yields around the world.

A year ago we harboured concerns about what less accommodating central banks would mean for economies and markets.

The march higher in US interest rates, global bond yields and the US dollar have indeed conspired to restrain global financial conditions, thus challenging investor sentiment.

The extent of the restraint has, however, been somewhat surprising – 2018 has been among the worst years on record for investment returns across a wide range of asset types, with few places for investors to hide.

So, while it was right to say risk-adjusted prospective returns would be lower in 2018 than 2017, we were too optimistic in thinking that global equities would come through relatively unscathed.

PAGE 1 OF 4