InvestmentsOct 7 2019

Making sense of London Capital & Finance

  • Describe what the problems were with London Capital & Finance
  • Identify some of the regulatory consequences of the collapse of LCF
  • Describe how the authorities have responded
  • Describe what the problems were with London Capital & Finance
  • Identify some of the regulatory consequences of the collapse of LCF
  • Describe how the authorities have responded
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
Making sense of London Capital & Finance

The authorities will need to carefully consider whether customers were actively advised that the mini-bonds were a suitable investment for them, or whether they simply took the orders.

LCF paid Surge Financial £58m to develop its online comparison sites promoting mini-bonds.

Mini-bonds schemes have operated without effective regulation for some time

Although not charged or subject to bail, the recent arrest of its founder demonstrates the robust approach being taken by the SFO in ensuring a thorough investigation takes place.

Given Surge’s reported turnover of £50m last year, the extent of Mr Surge’s involvement in LCF will no doubt be of particular importance to those investors unable to make a case to the FSCS.

Some might say that regulators did too little, too late, to protect the investors.

It is certainly proper that those involved in the wrongdoing which caused such devastating losses for investors should be held to account.

However, it is also perhaps welcome news that the regulatory bodies which are supposed protect people against such wrongdoing will also face investigations when they fail in their duties. 

The scandal is unlikely to end with LCF’s demise. For example, mini-bond investment firm Asset Life  - which has links to LCF - went into administration in July 2019, with administrators unable to locate several million in funds.

It had sold over 700 mini-bonds to some 500 investors. Even celebrity home-makeover guru Kevin McCloud recently hit the headlines when it emerged that some 200 investors in mini-bonds issued by his company now face significant losses.

It is clear that mini-bonds schemes have operated without effective regulation for some time.

The consequences for many investors are only now becoming clear.

While it will be cold comfort for those investors shouldering losses, it does appear that the government and the regulators are now determined to thoroughly investigate and - most importantly - learn hard lessons in the wake of the collapse of LCF and other mini-bond schemes.

Bambos Tsiattalou is the founding partner of Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, a criminal litigation practice 

PAGE 4 OF 4
CPD
Approx.30min
Please answer the six multiple choice questions below in order to bank your CPD. Multiple attempts are available until all questions are correctly answered.
  1. The London Capital & Finance mini-bonds were protected by the FSCS, true or false?
  2. What was especially dubious about the LCF mini-bonds?
  3. At what point did the regulator step in?
  4. How is the FSCS arguing that investors could get compensation?
  5. The Serious fraud Office has made arrests in connection with the collapse, true or false?
  6. What is the connection to Surge Financial?
  7. To bank your CPD you must sign in or Register.