Investments  

In the Redzone: 162 funds struggle to keep up

In the Redzone: 162 funds struggle to keep up

More than 160 funds have been plunged into Chelsea Financial Services' 'Redzone' after providing consistently disappointing returns.

Chelsea analysed the performance of all funds in the Investment Association universe and found 162 were in the 'Redzone' — meaning they underperformed their sector for three consecutive years, with no manager or process change to curb the trajectory in the last 18 months.

Most culprits were in the IA Global sector — 50 funds and £16.5bn of assets ‘redzoned’ by this year’s analysis were from this group. 

Article continues after advert

This was because a stellar 2020 for certain US equities saw the sector’s average performance soar, meaning the many funds in the sector not positioned towards the primarily tech-based ‘Covid winners’ struggled enormously to keep up.

The strong US performance also meant the second worst group was North America, as 26 funds and £9.4bn of assets failed to keep up with the high-performing sector and landed in the Redzone.

Europe excluding the UK and the UK All Companies sector were joint third with 11 funds apiece as value stocks - which dominate the UK market - struggled amid the backdrop of the pandemic.

Value stocks, with low price tags, typically perform well in market downturns but the coronavirus crisis has seen quality growth stocks, such as US tech companies, outperform. 

The troubled ten

Chelsea Financial Services “Dropzone” — the 10 funds from the RedZone that have underperformed their sector average by the biggest margin over three years — was dominated by global energy funds.

Oil funds have struggled enormously over the past year after a price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia coincided with the global shut down caused by the coronavirus crisis.

At one point, the price of oil turned negative over fears of storage and a lack of demanded.

Guinness Asset Management’s Jonathan Waghorn said Covid had represented the “largest external shock” to world oil demand in many, many years and that no conventional energy companies were immune.

The 'Dropzone'
Fund

Underperformance from sector average (%)

Schroder ISF Global Energy81.57
Guinness Global Energy77.39
Denker Global Financial43.41
Ninety One Global Special Situations38.95
Pictet Digital36.76
NFU Mutual Global Growth34.99
M&G North American Value34.48
MFS Meridian US Value33.87
BNY Mellon US Equity Income Fund33.28
Robeco BP US Large Cap Equities33.21

Darius McDermott, managing director of Chelsea Financial Services, said: “With many economies looking to ‘build back better’ with cleaner energy, it’s unlikely the sector will rebound strongly.

Equity income funds, typically skewed towards value stocks, and value funds also themselves also in the list after facing strong headwinds the past few years.

A spokesperson for M&G said: “Value investing has been out of favour for a number of years as investors have instead sought growth, quality and momentum companies, but there are signs that this is in the process of reversing.”

An NFU Mutual spokesperson said its Global Growth fund had moved to a different strategy in the second half of 2020 so it expected to improve performance over the long-term.

Fallen fund houses

The fund houses with the most funds in the Redzone were Schroders and Aberdeen Standard Investments, each with six funds struggling to keep up with their sector’s average.