Partner Content by Scottish Widows

The impact of living longer on retirement planning

By Iain McGowan. Head of Fund Proposition, Scottish Widows.

The challenge facing investors in retirement.

Since the pension reforms of 2015, investors have a greater degree of flexibility and choice when accessing their savings. Significant though the reforms were, they have to be seen within the context of other changes affecting retirement, particularly demographic developments.

Accelerating life expectancy

Accelerating life expectancy means that a 65-year old man in the UK has an average of 18.5 more years of life ahead of him, while women of that age will live on average for another 20.9 years, according to the most recent data from the Office for National Statistics. These are averages, of course – someone could live for just one or two years in retirement, but there’s also a growing chance that they could live to 100. A retiree with sufficient savings to get them to 85 could still be left with an empty pension pot if they live beyond that point.


It may be surprising to learn that people tend to misjudge how long they are likely to live. A study by the Pensions Policy Institute (PPI) that was sponsored by State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) showed that those aged 55-70 significantly underestimate their chances of surviving to greater ages. As a result, they may fail to take the required measures to prepare for a longer retirement.


Another error that people make is to overestimate the level of income they can expect in retirement. The average income they can expect is 27% (£6,445 p.a.) less than the amount they’ll need to be “financially comfortable” according to research by Opinium.

Unexpected outgoings

There may be many unexpected demands made on savings in retirement, including those from ongoing debt repayments such as mortgages, financial support for children and long-term care. These can be substantial. In England, for example, the average residential and nursing care costs are around £700 and £1,000 a week respectively.

From DB to DC

The decline in defined benefit (DB) – when many workers retired with the security of an income until death – has created difficulties. Due to insufficient private pension provisions and rising life expectancy, the move to defined contribution (DC) has placed far greater responsibility on individuals for their pensions.

Considerations for planning

Careful planning needs to take into account investment risk, inflation, the risk of expenditure such as long-term care and mortality drag. Mortality drag refers to the need for drawdown investments to work harder – as investors become older – if they’re to provide the same income as an annuity. Unlike those annuitants who live longer than average, and who benefit from the cross-subsidy inherent in risk pooling, drawdown investors don’t have pooled risk in place.