RegulationJan 29 2018

Countdown to SMCR: what to consider

  • Learn about the background to the Senior Managers and Certification Regimes and when it will apply.
  • Understand the four practical considerations for firms ahead of its implementation.
  • Comprehend what can be done now to prepare for the SMCR and who needs to be involved in implementation.
  • Learn about the background to the Senior Managers and Certification Regimes and when it will apply.
  • Understand the four practical considerations for firms ahead of its implementation.
  • Comprehend what can be done now to prepare for the SMCR and who needs to be involved in implementation.
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
Countdown to SMCR: what to consider

CP17/40 confirms that existing senior managers who remain in post and conduct essentially the same function will be grandfather to the new regime. For example, an existing CF1 (director) approved person would map across to become an SMF3 (executive director) and be subject to the Senior Manager regime.

Firms and individuals ought to consider, however, whether a senior management role is appropriately classified as an SMF, or whether it is better defined within the Certification Regime.

A material difference between the two regimes is that SMF holders require pre-approval from the FCA before carrying out their role and are subject to Statements of Responsibility (discussed later), whereas Certified-staff are self-certified by the firm, do not require FCA pre-approval and avoid Statement of Responsibility requirements.

Some senior staff prefer status as certified-staff in favour of having to take on the additional burden of SMF status.

Certified-staff status will not be available to those who are directors or equivalent and is more likely to apply to senior management who are below board-level, although remain sufficiently senior to warrant an additional degree of regulatory consideration and oversight.

Consideration of these points has seen firms re-assess their board and committee structures, review executive licences and/or position descriptions for consistency with the reality at the firm, accurately reflecting involvement of senior managers and meeting governance and regulatory expectations.

Statements of Responsibility

Statements of Responsibility (Statements) represent a cornerstone of the FCA philosophy in reiterating the importance it places, and wants firms and individuals to place, on the individual responsibility of senior managers.

Senior managers have always been expected to adhere to high standards of conduct in the discharge of their role, including through displaying integrity, competence and knowledge of and respect for the relevant regulatory requirements most pertinent to the individual roles. The essential elements of these expectations are set out in the FCA Handbook.

A Statement is expected to be approximately 300 words long and be expressed in positive language, describing an individual’s responsibilities. 

The largest firms are required to ensure that they have and maintain a map of responsibilities and consider the interaction of all the Statements for the constituent senior managers at the firm at all times.

Statements are significant because they impute culpability in respect of the matters in them. Statements effectively create a presumption of guilt, which will usually only be overcome where an individual can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the FCA, that they took reasonable steps in the conduct of their role to meet the responsibilities described in their Statement.

PAGE 2 OF 4