RegulationAug 3 2022

Clarity over crypto is urgently needed

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
Clarity over crypto is urgently needed
Photo by Rodnae Productions via Pexels

English law must recognise and protect digital assets to provide greater clarity for investors and owners, commentators have stated.

In its latest regulatory brief, City law firm CMS welcomed the Law Commission's newly launched consultation on digital assets but called for greater clarity to help regulators and individuals alike understand how digital assets, such as cryptocurrency, can be protected as it evolves.

According to CMS, there is still too much uncertainty over the legal principles governing assets such as crypto or non-fungible tokens.

The legal team at CMS wrote: "There are still many questions unanswered, and it would greatly assist the development and adoption of digital assets to have clarity on the applicable legal principles.

Mandating divestibility could therefore prevent innovation in the digital asset space.CMS legal brief

"Whether this clarity comes from creation of a parallel regime for digital assets or the acceptance that digital assets fall within the ambit of already established legal principles, is a debate that is likely to divide opinion."

CMS added the Law Commission was paving the way for a path to certainty with its new consultation, which has been prepared after the UK government requested it should review the law on digital assets to ensure they can continue to be protected as they evolve.

The 549-page consultation contains several proposals, including issues relating to the legal consequences of a transfer of a crypto-token, and questions over ownership.

For example, in chapter 13, the consultation looks at a general principle of the law of England and Wales which is traditionally expressed in Latin as follows: nemo dat quod non habet.

The consultation stated: "It is sometimes referred to as the “nemo dat” principle. The nemo dat principle is “the basic rule in relation to title in English law … that no one can give what they do not have."

The thing that lacks any certainty is the definition of the 'asset' itself.Tim Bennett, Killik

CMS has also welcomed proposals within the Law Commission's consultation over divestibility and whether or not it should be mandatory or kept flexible for people wanting to divest ownership of digital assets.

CMS said: "The reason for this is to ensure the law remains flexible and capable of adapting to the nuances of some digital assets which are not divestible.

"Mandating divestibility could therefore prevent innovation in the digital asset space. The consultation suggests that this is consistent with the way divestibility is more generally considered as a characteristic of property rights."

Killik's head of education, Tim Bennett, commented: "The thing that lacks any certainty is the definition of the 'asset' itself. [Is it a] Commodity, a currency, a security? All or none of these?

"Nail that down and the surrounding ecosystem isn't totally alien, for example: exchanges, lenders, exchange-traded funds, and so on."

However, some advisers have yet to see a swathe of clients approach them to discuss crypto. Red Circle Financial Planning's Darren Cooke said: "I've only ever had one client mention [crypto]. He didn't proceed."

Background

This comes as the Financial Conduct Authority strengthened rules to tackle misleading adverts that promote investing in high-risk products. 

In a 205-page policy document released this week (August 1), the City watchdog unveiled proposals to impose marketing restrictions for high-risk investments. 

As reported by FTAdviser's Sally Hickey, the new rules do not apply to crypto asset promotions, as the FCA is waiting for legislation to confirm how crypto marketing will be brought under its remit.

The crypto market remains a Wild West.Myron Jobson, Interactive Investor

However, these rules are expected to align with those for other high-risk investments. At the time, Myron Jobson, senior personal finance analyst for Interactive Investor, said: "The FCA’s clampdown of high-risk products does not apply to cryptoassets, the area of investments where more stringent rules and regulation are needed most.

"But the FCA said that rules will be published for this sector after the government confirms how it will be brought under its remit. There is no time to delay.

"While cryptocurrency has come a long way since its humble beginnings in the niches of the internet, the crypto market remains a Wild West – blighted by scams, fraud and irresponsible marketing."

simoney.kyriakou@ft.com