Inheritance TaxApr 8 2019

Top five inheritance tax queries

  • Identify the most common queries about IHT among clients.
  • Describe transferable nil rate bands and how periodic charges work.
  • Identify the 14-year shadow and when it takes effect and the other exemptions and reliefs available.
  • Identify the most common queries about IHT among clients.
  • Describe transferable nil rate bands and how periodic charges work.
  • Identify the 14-year shadow and when it takes effect and the other exemptions and reliefs available.
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
Top five inheritance tax queries

As more and more discretionary trusts are approaching their 10th anniversary, questions around how the periodic charge is calculated have increased.

3. 14-year shadow – when does the shadow take effect?

People have heard of the 14-year shadow but are unsure when it becomes relevant. The 14-year shadow is only an issue if, on death, the total of the CLTs and PETs made in the previous seven years exceeds the available nil rate band, meaning that tax is payable.

For those considering making a PET and a CLT at or around the same time, it is logical to make the CLT before the PET as this can impact the periodic charges.

However, when making a PET the donor should also be wary of any CLTs made in the previous seven years, and this is where professional advice is paramount.

Let’s consider two clients, Bert and Eric. Both die on April 6 2022, when the NRB is £370,000, with estates valued at £500,000 each. Both had made gifts in the previous seven years:

  • Bert made a £200,000 outright gift to his daughter on April 6 2015 and then a £200,000 gift into a discretionary trust on April 6 2018.
  • Eric also made the same gifts but he settled the £200,000 into the discretionary trust on the April 6 2015, with the outright gift to his daughter on the April 6 2018.

Both are divorced, so when calculating the tax payable on the estates they have one NRB.

Bert and Eric’s 2015 gifts can be ignored as they survived seven years, but the 2018 gifts need to be considered.

Both use up the NRB first, meaning that the estate has a NRB of £170,000 (£370,000 - £200,000). This results in £330,000 being taxable at 40 per cent, giving an IHT liability on both estates of £132,000.

But if both estates have the same tax liability, where does the 14-year shadow come in?

Now we need to consider the tax on Eric’s 2018 failed PET. In considering the tax on the estate, we have to look back at the history of gifts in the seven years before death.

However, when looking at the tax on a failed PET, we have to go back seven years from the date of the PET; and Eric had made a CLT within this seven-year period.

Even though it was made more than seven years before death, the CLT now needs to be taken into account in calculating the tax on the failed PET.

PAGE 3 OF 5