What the advice industry wants from new FCA boss Rathi

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
What the advice industry wants from new FCA boss Rathi

The advice industry has welcomed the news Nikhil Rathi is set to become the next chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority in the hope he will "steer a steady course" for the sector. 

The London Stock Exchange boss is expected to take up the helm at the regulator in October, at a critical time for the financial services industry in the aftermath of the coronavirus crisis.

The arrival of Mr Rathi at the City watchdog has been well received within the advice sector, but Neil Moles, chief executive of advice firm Progeny, said he looked for stability for advisers and their clients in the future regulator. 

Mr Moles said: "The FCA will have an important role to play in implementing strategies for developing sustainable economic growth and it is reassuring that they will be in good hands.

"In these uncertain times for the industry, advisers and their clients, the new chief executive's clear priorities must be to steer a steady course through the months and years ahead."

The Personal Investment Management & Financial Advice Association warned the new boss faced "many competing priorities". 

Liz Field, chief executive of the trade body, said the new leadership came at a time of "significant change" for the industry. 

She said: "Nikhil Rathi is an extremely knowledgeable and experienced leader, as his successful stewardship of the London Stock Exchange as its chief executive for the past six years demonstrates.

"His knowledge of the wealth management and financial advice sector, as well as prior experience of working within government, leading on the UK's European Union and international financial services interests, will be particularly welcome at a time when we are renegotiating our relationship with Europe and striving to form new relationships with international partners.

"We look forward to having a productive and constructive working relationship with him and wish him well in his new role."

Earlier this year Pimfa called on the FCA  to "carefully consider" whether its regime is fit for purpose amid "totally unsustainable" regulatory and compensation costs faced by its members. 

Oxford-educated Mr Rathi joined the London Stock Exchange in 2014 after 11 years at HM Treasury, during which time he served as private secretary to prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown between 2005 to 2008. 

Mr Rathi was director of the financial services group at the Treasury where he led international legislative negotiations in the EU. Before that he was head of the financial stability unit during the 2008 financial crisis. 

The issue of compensation costs for investment and pension advice has been an area of increasing contention this year and Keith Richards, chief executive of the Personal Finance Society, called on the new FCA chief executive to provide clarity on the subject. 

Mr Richards said: "The regulator needs to re-visit the current system of professional indemnity insurance and FSCS levies which are no longer fit for purpose, since it ultimate increases the cost of regulated advice, increases financial risk and ultimately reduces access to advice for consumers by increasing volatility for advisers.

"Also an active programme of balanced reporting is needed which includes examples of ‘good practice’ so as not to distort the true picture of the sector or erode public trust."

Earlier this year the Financial Services Compensation Scheme confirmed its levy for 2020/21 had increased to £649m, with advisers set to shoulder £229m of the bill. 

Speaking at an industry conference this month Baroness Nicky Morgan warned the only way to reduce the growing levy was to prevent the spread of investment scams and unauthorised firms in the market. 

It is an issue which Victor Sacks, principal at VS Associates Ltd, agreed needed to be prioritised as part of the Mr Rathi's agenda. 

Mr Sacks said a "more robust" checking process was needed when authorising new firms and "more autonomy" required within the FSCS and Financial Ombudsman Service. 

He added: "I’d also ask him to look at the lack of assistance from providers during Covid 19 to advisers, with some operating by ‘email only’ or in other cases not even accepting business."

rachel.mortimer@ft.com

What do you think about the issues raised by this story? Email us on fa.letters@ft.com to let us know.