The Financial Conduct Authority's latest fee proposals could hinder entry into the advice market and increase financial pressure on smaller companies, commentators have warned.
Concerns have been raised following a consultation paper published by the regulator last week, which suggested increasing the application fees paid by new businesses seeking its authorisation, something which it last reviewed in 2014.
The proposals could see fees for some of the most complex authorisation applications increase by almost 70 per cent.
Keith Richards, chief executive of the Personal Finance Society, said there was not a lot of data to suggest the fee shake up would not harm market competition in any way.
In 2019 the total cost of authorisations at the City watchdog was £19m, but application fees only covered 33 per cent of this cost, with revenues of £6.2m.
Mr Richards also warned the PFS was concerned the FCA had suggested introducing a £250 charge for Senior Manager and Certification Regime applications, saying it could "introduce burdens for smaller firms".
The new fee was also mooted alongside a charge for companies that submit to gain or extend its control over an authorised person, a process that is currently free of charge.
The FCA said it was "reasonable to seek a contribution" from businesses that requested its services after they were authorised, in a bid to reduce the bill passed to existing fee-payers.
But the proposals have worried the industry, which has urged the regulator to consider the unintended consequences on the financial burden already faced by many advice companies.
Mr Richards said: "The changes to the SMCR were prompted by the financial crisis, so there is a danger this will create a perception that regulatory change, prompted by issues in the banking sector, is resulting in costs and burdens for smaller firms, and reducing access to advice for consumers.
"However, a positive message to take away is that the FCA recognises how complex fee structures can be and have committed to simplify these for the market."
He added: "I think we all know someone who has been exasperated by the administrative burden of fees and so we can hope this eases things and that they will reflect on whether the complex consumer compensation funding system is the best way moving forward."
Tim Fassam, director of government relations and policy at trade body Pimfa, said: "At a time when firms are struggling to manage increased Financial Services Compensation Scheme costs and a challenging economic environment, the FCA must be careful to ensure any further increase in regulatory fees is well justified and transparent.”
Reforming regulatory costs has featured at the top of Pimfa's to-do list this year, with the trade body enshrining its campaign to lowering the FSCS levy and professional indemnity insurance costs in its recently updated manifesto.
In last week's consultation paper, the FCA warned its proposals to increase application fees would still not recover the full cost of processing applications, and said the introduction of fees for changes in control and applications under the SMCR would go some way to plugging this deficit.