We use cookies to improve site performance and enhance your user experience. If you'd like to disable cookies on this device, please see our cookie management page.
If you close this message or continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies on this devise in accordance with our cookie policy, unless you disable them.

Close
In association with

Home > Investments > Commodities

By Nick Reeve | Published Nov 04, 2013

Has relationship between gold stocks and managers changed?

Some of the country’s leading fund buyers are backing gold miners and commodity-related equities to bounce back from heavy losses – and it bears all the hallmarks of a classic contrarian trade that investors should be wary of missing out on.

Multi-managers including Jupiter’s John Chatfeild-Roberts and Cazenove’s Marcus Brookes have bought into gold equities in the past few months, primarily backing BlackRock’s star commodities manager Evy Hambro and his £1.5bn BlackRock Gold & General fund.

This comes on the back of massive losses for gold mining companies, which has seen Mr Hambro’s fund post a loss of 49.6 per cent in the three years to October 25, according to FE Analytics.

The £1.1bn JPMorgan Natural Resources fund – another popular choice for commodities exposure among multi-managers – has also suffered a three-year loss of nearly 40 per cent, but has recently been brought in to Cazenove’s flagship Multi-Manager Diversity fund by Mr Brookes.

The Cazenove multi-manager team believes the “undervalued, under-owned and unloved” area of gold shares – and commodities more generally – should be an area of interest. In September, co-manager Robin McDonald said this area was the “most shorted” by hedge funds, as managers have been betting on the companies in this sector to fall further in price.

Cazenove’s multi-managers have a good track record of taking contrarian positions. Last year, the team sold out of emerging markets, avoiding this year’s sell-off to a greater degree than many peers.

But being right this time round may not be quite so simple as there is a dislocation between gold miners and the price of gold, which long-term investors in the asset class – Evy Hambro notably among them – are starting to believe may be permanent.

In his most recent fund commentary at the end of September, Mr Hambro spoke of “continued volatility in the gold price” and how he had reduced exposure to companies that could suffer in a “lower gold price environment”.

As the financial crisis took hold in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers and spread throughout Europe, the price of gold rocketed as investors sought safe havens. Between November 27 2008 and August 24 2011, gold went from $756 an ounce to $1,883 an ounce, an increase of 149 per cent.

In the same period, the HSBC Global Gold index of gold mining companies rose by 100 per cent.

But while gold companies failed to capture the full effect of the rise in gold prices, they caught almost double the downside – while the gold price fell 28.2 per cent from its peak to October 25 2013, the HSBC Global Gold index collapsed, falling 53.4 per cent.

So far in 2013, the price of gold has fallen 20.2 per cent to October 29, but since a low point of $1,205 dollars an ounce in June, it has rebounded back, gaining 11.7 per cent – possibly connected to investors growing fearful of a US default and seeking a safe haven.

Page 1 of 2

visible-status-Standard story-url-IA p28 041113 news analysis.xml

COMMENT AND REACTION
Most Popular
More on FTAdviser
FTA jobs