RDR is a huge challenge, but definitely not a ‘disaster’

Kevin O’Donnell

Kevin O’Donnell

The RDR has been a disaster for IFAs and the financial services industry. Not my words but those of an erudite expert speaking at an industry conference last week.

We should pay attention but I beg to differ with his view. Damaging for many IFAs? Yes. Hugely challenging? Yes. An unmitigated disaster? Probably not, for reasons I will explain.

First it is worth looking at what was said. Research fellow Michael Johnson of the respected think-tank the Centre for Policy Studies was speaking at a conference organised by Sipp and retirement specialist Dentons.

Article continues after advert

His view was that the RDR had proved to be disastrous for the industry and had undermined the provision of financial advice in the UK.

Quoted by FTAdviser.com he said: “RDR has been an absolute disaster, look at the six objectives outlined by [the then FSA head] Sir Callum McCarthy at the Gleneagles conference.

“The first one is to broaden the availability of advice. The second one is to curtail the cost of advice. The RDR has achieved very little.” He then went on to suggest that the RDR had failed on nearly every level.

He believes that the only benefits have been to support professional firms and push some weaker IFAs out of business.

Talking about regulation generally he said he had “enormous sympathy for advisers”, adding that “advisers are first and foremost distributors and not advisers.” And perhaps there is the rub.

They were called “advisers” or IFAs but really they were “sellers.” This has always been the inherent contradiction in the financial advice sector in the UK: sales disguised as advice. Of course there were many dedicated and professional IFAs who looked after and advised their clients carefully but the prospect of a juicy commission on every sale undoubtedly produced a warped view of what advice was and undermined the vital fiduciary duties of any genuine adviser.

Now, I am no PR man for the RDR in all its glory and I believe it has thrown up many unexpected problems but I cannot find it within me to brand the RDR a disaster because it simply is not. Annoying, painful, blunt, contradictory, challenging, unfair? Yes to all those, but a disaster it is not, otherwise we would have no financial advice sector left and that is not what I see.

On the contrary, I see an increasingly confident and professional sector with a promising future. It is perhaps not a million miles away from what Sir Callum McCarthy envisioned at the Gleneagles conference which heralded many of the key RDR changes.

The six RDR objectives outlined by Sir Callum were as follows, along with my view of progress so far after each one:

1. “An industry that engages with consumers in a way that delivers more clarity for them on products and services.” Progress: The box has to be ticked on this one. There is greater clarity, the consumer now knows that his adviser is working for him and not a product provider.