How social responsibility can be a key part of business strategy

  • Explain where financial services is lacking in social responsibility
  • Describe the consequences of companies failing on social impact
  • Identify how financial services can improve their social impact
  • Explain where financial services is lacking in social responsibility
  • Describe the consequences of companies failing on social impact
  • Identify how financial services can improve their social impact
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
How social responsibility can be a key part of business strategy
If companies are not prioritising improving their social impact, they risk limiting the pool of talent at their disposal (Jason Alden/Bloomberg)

ESG has become firmly embedded as a key part of any company’s corporate strategy, and these policies now come under intense scrutiny from investors, employees, customers and governments alike. 

However, while money is being poured into sustainability initiatives across the board, a recent study by management consultancy Kearney suggests that many companies are still maturing when implementing programmes to address the “S” of environmental, social and governance. 

For example, fewer than a quarter (22 per cent) of companies partner with a non-governmental organisation to manage social impact initiatives, leading to a knowledge gap in businesses’ social initiatives and preventing organisations from pursuing high-impact projects that are beyond their capabilities.

One industry stood out as being behind the curve when it comes to conducting successful social impact initiatives: financial services. 

Scoring an average of 62.6 points out of 100, the financial services industry was the lowest among the seven sectors surveyed. In fact, the financial services industry had the lowest score in every one of the 15 sub-dimensions assessed, excluding “decision-makers”, where consumer goods companies came last. 

This naturally begs the question, why is the financial services industry seemingly behind its peers when it comes to positively impacting communities? And how can the industry act decisively to improve before it loses favour with socially conscious consumers? 

Key factors behind the score

The Index of Social Performance measured the social maturity of companies based on three social impact dimensions: strategy, operating model and performance.

While they performed poorly across the board, the following factors had a significant impact on the financial services industry’s overall score: 

  • Project selection: 76 per cent of the companies surveyed use only ad hoc or internal processes to select projects compared with the leading practice of soliciting proposals and working with communities to get input on projects.
  • Partnership on delivery: only 12 per cent of companies reported working with experts and NGOs to execute projects.
  • Means of engagement: more than 50 per cent of the companies focused on donations as their primary social impact strategy and only 16 per cent blended that with volunteering, pro bono services or other forms of engagement. This compares with the overall leader profile, where only a third are focused solely on donation.
  • Measurement: only a quarter of the companies used a return on investment methodology to track the impact of their programmes.

Roadblocks to social maturity

The financial services industry is often perceived as being profit-driven, with a primary focus on maximising shareholder value. However, this perspective ignores the pivotal role that banks and other financial institutions play in society as key drivers of socioeconomic mobility and upliftment.

PAGE 1 OF 5