OpinionAug 14 2023

Buy now, pay later firms fear regulation changes are not fit-for-purpose

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
Buy now, pay later firms fear regulation changes are not fit-for-purpose
Increased regulation could lessen the appeal of buy now, pay later (ArseniiPalivoda/Envato)
comment-speech

Simplicity lies at the heart of the appeal of buy now, pay later.

Why pay in one hit when, by ticking a few boxes, you can have manageable monthly installments at zero interest?

And instead of the time-consuming process of applying for a regulated consumer finance product, you can speed through checkout by using unregulated BNPL. 

It is no surprise that without the due diligence "friction" that comes with traditional credit arrangements, merchants have found BNPL to be a powerful tool in getting sales over the line.

Such simplicity has helped propel the UK sector from small beginnings to US$27.3bn (£21.5bn) in 2022 and a projected US$55.1bn by 2028.

Some have even suggested that the double hit on BNPL — more friction and a new, uneven playing field — will lead to operators withdrawing from the market altogether

That meteoric expansion, however, is now in some doubt as a result of proposed government regulation.

A small but growing percentage of users who have been unable to manage their BNPL commitments, plus its disproportionate popularity with the under-30s, has prompted HM Treasury to table a range of changes to the status quo.

Key to these is the plan for BNPL to lose its largely unregulated status. 

Up until now, firms providing interest-free delayed payment have benefited from an exemption found under Article 60F of the Financial Services and Markets Act, which exempts them from regulation agreements where no interest is charged and there are 12 or fewer instalments.

The 60F exemption has meant that not only do they not need to be authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority, but also that they have not needed to provide consumer agreements strictly in line with the Consumer Credit Act.

As they stand, the government’s proposals will do away with this exemption and require BNPL operators to be authorised and have their credit agreements fall within the scope of CCA, as used in traditional credit agreements for unsecured loans or credit cards.

Instead of minimal checks, BNPL lenders will have to undertake mandatory affordability assessments and be subject to "lender liability" under section 75 of the CCA.

Unsurprisingly, BNPL firms fear that the changes are not fit-for-purpose and may have unintended consequences. 

They see the loss of their unregulated status leading to disproportionate friction for consumers seeking short-term credit.

If someone currently uses BNPL at an online checkout, according to BNPL firms they can be expected to complete the purchase in a minute and a half, versus 30 seconds for credit cards.

Based on this Klarna modelling, the timeframe could expand to five minutes under the new UK rules. 

The danger is that this will reduce the appeal of BNPL. By adding extra layers to the application process, BNPL’s USP over other forms of finance will disappear.  

It is argued that this problem is made worse by the fact that the new rules will not be applied to merchants, only to third-party providers of finance.

Merchants will be able to offer short-term, interest-free credit directly to consumers in the largely unregulated space that BNPL has been operating in so far.

Although lenders will be able to leverage on-boarding technology to speed screening, and reduce point-of-sale friction to a minimum, it is still going to be challenging to beat relatively friction-free and unregulated direct merchant provision.

The concern for BNPL operators is that an uneven playing field is being opened up. A host of big names such as PayPal, Apple and Google, which have already announced their intention to increase their presence in consumer finance, will be given an unfair advantage.

Some have even suggested that the double hit on BNPL — more friction and a new, uneven playing field — will lead to operators withdrawing from the market altogether. 

Given that the UK will be one of only a few countries heavily regulating this area of finance, multinational BNPL fintechs might choose to focus their efforts on jurisdictions less prone to "over regulation".

This could be particularly tempting for them because the looming changes are going to allow consumers to use the Financial Ombudsman Service and, potentially, game the mis-selling process.

The consultation period for the government’s proposals ended in April this year, but legislation is not expected to be presented to parliament until mid-2024 at the earliest.

From the number of enquiries LendingMetrics is now receiving from this sector, it seems at least some have decided regulated BNPL still has growth potential. They are sensibly making the most of this time to prepare their back offices for the new regime.

David Wylie is commercial director of LendingMetrics