InvestmentsNov 21 2013

Role of forward guidance queried by economists

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by

The Bank’s inflation report, which came out last week, suggested there was a 50 per cent chance of joblessness falling to 7 per cent by the end of 2014, 18 months earlier than it estimated in August.

Under the Bank’s policy of forward guidance, the Monetary Policy Committee will not consider raising interest rates from 0.5 per cent until unemployment falls at, or below, this threshold.

However, governor Mark Carney was keen to stress that the 7 per cent level was “a staging post, not a trigger,” which would only result in a rate rise if other areas of the market were functioning at the desired level.

“What matters in the adjustment of monetary policy are the positions that exist at the point the threshold is reached,” he said, stressing that other factors, such as a pickup in productivity, would have to be identified.

The Bank introduced forward guidance earlier this year to expose the public to the thinking and criteria behind changes in monetary policy. But economists have said the strategy has been ineffective.

Simon Ward, chief economist at Henderson Global Investors, said the announcement made in the inflation report “reinforced the view that forward guidance is a waste of time”.

“As we have seen, the Bank of England has dramatically altered its unemployment forecast… anybody believing that interest rates will stay on hold until late 2015 is basing that view on very little,” he said.

The key problem was that forward guidance was brought in at the worst possible time for the economy, according to David Tinsley, UK economist at BNP Paribas.

“When they were introducing it, they [the Bank] were a bit unlucky that it was just when growth was picking up,” the economist said.

Mr Tinsley suggested there was a case for forward guidance in some form, because the market could have already priced in a rate rise from evidence of a strengthened economy had it not had reassurance from the Bank that it would hold off.

But picking the labour market as the most significant variable could have been a mistake, as it is “shifting quite quickly,” Mr Tinsley added.

“Perhaps a pledge to keep rates on hold for 18 months would have been better,” he said, as a “cut-and-dried approach” would have been more straightforward.

Jonathan Loynes, chief European economist at Capital Economics, said that while the inflation report provided “superficial support” for the idea that interest rates would rise sooner than expected, his projections remained more in line with the Bank’s as he believed excess capacity in the economy would mean rates stayed lower for longer.

But he noted the markets “never seemed to swallow the August report projections and have consistently priced in the first hike in interest rates in 2015,” which means that as unemployment falls further they will get increasingly jittery.

“We fear that Mr Carney and colleagues will have their work cut out to prevent market interest rates from rising further – with potentially adverse effects on the economic recovery – if unemployment remains on its recent downward trend,” he said.

Inflation report cements the view that the UK economy is bouncing back

The inflation report, press conference and ensuing question-and-answer session suggested the Bank of England was in bullish mood – and with good reason.

“For the first time in a long time, you don’t have to be an optimist to see the glass as half full. The recovery has finally taken hold,” governor Mark Carney said, as he revealed the Bank had upped its UK growth projections from 1.4 to 1.6 per cent for this year.

Meanwhile, inflation, which spiralled close to 3 per cent this year, could fall to within the Bank’s 2 per cent target in the next 12 months, Mr Carney said at the conference.

These revisions come amid overwhelming evidence that the UK economic recovery is gaining traction. Last month, the International Monetary Fund doubled its growth projection for the UK, and now expects the economy to grow 1.4 per cent, the same rate predicted by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, which was previously forecasting 1.2 per cent.

Meanwhile, the day before the conference, it was revealed that UK inflation rose 2.2 per cent in the year to October, down from 2.7 per cent a month earlier and the lowest level since 2009.

The tone of the inflation report led Azad Zangana (pictured), European economist at Schroders, to bring his forecast for an interest rate rise forward by almost a year, to the start of 2016, although he does not think the recovery is sustainable enough to pencil in a rate rise any earlier than that.

“The UK’s recovery has considerable momentum going into 2014, but whether the debt-fuelled housing recovery translates into anything more than a short-term rebound in demand is questionable, particularly in the absence of wage growth outpacing inflation,” he explained.