Your Industry  

Self-invested Personal Pensions - April 2014



    The regulator has been making it clear for many years that it has concerns about the way some Sipp providers conduct business. And one way it has been trying to combat it is with thematic reviews of the market.

    Capital adequacy rules have been delayed numerous times, but are expected to come into force in the second quarter of 2014. The much-anticipated paper was originally meant to be released in September 2013, but has since been delayed owing to large numbers of responses to its consultation and the FCA having gathered more information than originally forecast.

    Another large part of the thematic review will be providers who allow non-standard investments in Sipps. While there is nothing wrong with having more esoteric investments in a portfolio – many investors choose Sipps purely due to being able to hold non-standard investments – those who do not undertake proper due diligence should be concerned as they may struggle to continue to survive in the market.

    Covering 56 providers, our biannual survey takes a look at changes in the market over the past six months and a forward look to see how some firms are preparing for potential capital adequacy rules.

    But let’s not forget the Sipp market has been through major changes before, starting from when it was first regulated in 2007, when platforms started to grow and then last year with RDR.

    The market has clearly proved itself to be adaptable, but for now, providers must play the waiting game to see what the FCA proposes and how it will affect businesses. Undoubtedly there will be some providers who do not make the cut, but others – namely those which have already been preparing for capital adequacy rules – will prosper.

    In this special report


    Please answer the six multiple choice questions below in order to bank your CPD. Multiple attempts are available until all questions are correctly answered.

    1. How many Sipps were set up in 2013?

    2. How many Sipps were lost in 2013?

    3. What percentage of Sipps are full-range?

    4. How many survey respondents did not state whether they would reach capital adequacy requirements should they come into place?

    5. Who said the RDR was not a big deal and it was “mainly just a case of updating forms and ensuring that the agreements are clearly in place for ongoing adviser charging payments”?

    6. Which firm has the highest average Sipp value?

    Nearly There…

    You have successfully answered all the questions correctly, well done!

    I completed this CPD in

    To bank your CPD please complete the form below.

    Were the stated learning objectives met?

    Why weren't they met?

    What did you learn from undertaking this CPD exercise?

    Why did you undertake this piece of learning?

    Any comments about this article or FTAdviser's CPD in general?


    Congratulations, you have successfully completed and banked this piece of CPD

    Already Banked!

    You have already banked for this article.

    To bank your CPD you must sign in or


    One or more questions have been incorrectly answered,
 please review your answers and try again.

    Please complete all the above text fields to bank your CPD.

    More Your Industry CPDSee my completed CPDSee all CPD