InvestmentsMay 29 2014

Right side of history

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by

Political uncertainty and currency volatility have been flashpoints for emerging markets this year. Sell-offs initially triggered by concerns about economic stability and the outlook for growth have been prolonged by geopolitical events. That volatility is likely to continue given that countries holding uncertain elections amount to 28 per cent of total emerging market gross domestic product.

Investors have to put today’s market nerves into historical context. Unlike the 1990s, today we have floating currencies in many more emerging markets and hold much larger foreign exchange reserves. Having floating rather than fixed rate currencies acts like a pressure valve on emerging markets – it means that tension gets released on a daily basis and in reaction and alignment to the world’s major currencies. This may mean sharper daily volatility, but it creates continual rebalancing instead of perpetuating a broken system.

Despite significant short-term headwinds for the asset class, the long-term structural dynamics for many emerging market economies remain intact. Urbanisation ratios in India and China are dramatically below US and Japan, which should lead to higher levels of income and consumption, supporting market returns.

Also, volatility has weighed on emerging market equity performance, resulting in cheaper valuations. When price-to-book values have fallen below 1.5x, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index has historically registered double-digit returns over the following 12 months. Given emerging markets are approaching their lowest levels in over five years, history suggests that investors can expect reasonable returns looking ahead, especially relative to developed market equities.

Investors focused on long-term fundamentals will find this presents an attractive entry point. There are always unforeseen risks in emerging markets and it is an asset class driven more by sentiment and confidence than others. After the strong performance of developed market equities in 2013, emerging market equities currently trade at the largest discount to developed market equities in nearly 10 years.

It is important to remember investments are made in companies and not countries, hence the enormous differentiation among emerging markets and the need for an active approach to separate winners from losers. It is a big mistake to take a blanket approach to emerging markets and tar them all with the same brush. We are talking about a part of the world that represents 80 per cent of the world’s population and 50 per cent of it is GDP, so of course there are huge variations, geographically, culturally and economically. Some areas have been punished on a price basis simply by virtue of their locations, whereas others carry significantly more risk, so you have to be selective.

The difference in total returns in MSCI country performance over the last 12 months has spanned more than 50 per cent, highlighting the importance of a selective investment strategy.

Some further investment considerations about emerging markets include:

• Despite posting generally strong growth rates, it is worth remembering that emerging markets still account for only 11 per cent of global market capitalisation in the MSCI All Country World Index.

• Emerging markets are becoming a reliable source of income: EM dividends a share growth has outpaced developed markets dividend growth and outpaced EM earnings a share growth over the long-term.

• The ratio of passengers per automotive (per 1000 people) is 797 in the US. That compares to 58 in China and just 18 in India, which illustrates the scope of potential growth in the emerging market car industry alone. There is vast potential for growth as emerging market societies become more affluent and this sector should be supported by strong economics. Also, China is set to outstrip the US as the leading market in premium cars in a few short years.

Despite the broader global macro environment, some managers have not made big changes to asset allocation. They continue to be underweight in current account surplus markets of Korea and Taiwan, this is unlikely to change as there just do not tend to be the types of businesses managers want to own in these countries, notably long-term growth opportunities are less plentiful. In contrast, with emerging market currencies in generally looking cheap (to our long-term fair value), some managers remain overweight particularly in countries like India, South Africa and Brazil. Changes made on an individual stock level are driven by managers’ view on their economics, duration and governance and through due diligence conducted by analysts.

When pessimism about an asset class is this strong, usually that is a compelling opportunity to buy at an attractive price if you have a long-term time horizon (five plus years). While caution is merited – cheap assets can always get cheaper, after all – it is worth remembering that beyond the noise there is a compelling case for higher risk emerging markets. At the moment, buying EM is neither obvious nor popular – but buy before it is obvious, because the obvious thing is almost always wrong. History suggests fortune favours the bold.

Richard Titherington is chief investment officer, emerging markets, at JP Morgan Asset Management

Key points

Long-term investors should be accumulating emerging markets exposure at current levels

Volatility has weighed on emerging market equity performance, resulting in cheaper valuations

Despite the broader global macro environment, some managers have not made big changes to asset allocation