Opinion  

The case for tougher regulation of buy-to-let

Ashley Wassall

Yesterday (5 January), perhaps in a fit of pique brought on by labouring into the office with a stubborn cold on a frosty winter morning after a prolonged festive break, I wrote some acerbic words about the mortgage market.

Among other things, I railed against the ‘unfairness’ which I believe is entrenched at the heart of the market and which seems to gift cheap, plentiful mortgages to a growing population of private landlords, while first-time buyers or other lower income wannabe homeowners are increasingly priced out of the market.

Based on the handful of comments below the blog and the more voluminious and vehement responses I received directly, opinion was polarised, not least with the call for tougher regulation to discourage buy-to-let borrowing.

Article continues after advert

I love nothing more than a healthy debate, so here are some thoughts setting out, for want of a more elegant way of putting it, why I’m right.

First a few facts. House prices may have cooled a little in recent weeks, but they were still up by more than 8 per cent last year, according to data published by Nationwide Building Society and quoted by The Guardian.

According to a piece published by our parent paper the Financial Times last week, all five of the main house price indices recorded major rises over the past 12 months - and three out of five now have prices between 4 per cent and 10 per cent above their high watermark pre-crisis.

Now of course, supply is a factor here: we’re building less than half of the houses we need to satiate rampant demand, according to most estimates.

However, purchases for rent are merely exacerbating the issue. According to figures published in the Times, 2.4m of the close to 3m homes built since 2001, around 80 per cent, were bought by private landlords. An article in the Telegraph last week claimed that by 2032, more than one third of UK properties will be privately rented.

Data published by the Daily Mail in November from Kent Reliance revealed the value of buy-to-let property in the UK is set to top £1,000bn this year, which would represent an increase of around 40 per cent on the pre-crisis peak.

The same article stated there are now 627 buy-to-let mortgages available compared to 142 in 2010; I know from my own forays into the housing market these are typically at far lower rates with far lower deposits than residential alternatives.

At the same time - and I would argue as a direct corollary - rents are spiralling. According to reports in the Telegraph and Independent, rental costs are now at new record levels having risen 4 per cent over the past year. In the Capital and the south, they are up 6 per cent and 9 per cent respectively.

At the risk of being melodramatic, at a time when benefits are being cut and food bank use is growing, this is close to indefensible.