MortgagesFeb 6 2024

Brokers: high mortgage costs hit everyone, regardless of wealth

twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
Brokers: high mortgage costs hit everyone, regardless of wealth
“It’s a sobering thought that hits close to home for many who are already grappling with the burden of mortgage payments on modest incomes.” (Karolina Grabowska/Pexels)

Brokers have said most people will be impacted by rising mortgage costs, regardless of their wealth.

It comes after ex-science minister and MP George Freeman was forced to give up his ministerial position due to increased mortgage payments which rose by £1,200 from £800 to £2,000 per month.

“If those at the top are feeling the squeeze, what hope is there for ordinary folks who are barely making ends meet?” Our Mortgage Broker director, Akhi Mair, said.

“It’s a sobering thought that hits close to home for many who are already grappling with the burden of mortgage payments on modest incomes."

He said the situation should serve as a “wake-up call” for government action, calling for policies that prioritise housing affordability for all.

“It’s time for solutions that ensure everyone has a fair shot at owning a home without sacrificing their financial security,” he added.

Living at financial limits

Questions were raised after Freeman’s announcement, with many asking how he could be affected by the increased payments while on a salary of around £118,000 per year.

But some brokers argued this was an example of a common occurrence where people live at financial limits. 

Charwin Private Clients director, Ranald Mitchell, said this is a “true testament” showing many people live to their financial limits.

“It’s all relative but the same situation and same life choices, regardless of income.”

Additionally, Orchard Financial Advisers managing director, Ben Parks, explained: “Some may argue the richest in our society will have larger mortgages and therefore face bigger hikes in monthly payments. However, it is all relative.”

Parks pointed out that a £1,200 jump for the ex-minister is a “significant increase”, but in real terms it is no worse than a £200 jump to someone on a very low income.

“While the numbers are different, the anguish is the same,” he said.

A similar sentiment was expressed by Magni Finance director, Ashley Thomas, who said: “Regardless of wealth, the majority of people have been impacted with increased mortgage rates.

“We have seen a number of wealthier customers reduce spending due to increased mortgage costs.”

He said while changes to financial stability do not impact high net worth people as much, they have still been impacted and have had to scale back.

FT Adviser readers warned about the dangers of living at financial limits, acknowledging that circumstances could change.

adrian.c86210
Mortgage interest rates at c. 5%pa? When I bought my first house in 1988 it was 10%pa - and within a couple of years it went up to 15%pa.

Inflation at 10%pa? I remember in the 1970's looking for a bank or building society account into which I could pay my paper round money that was paying a rate of interest that could offset inflation at 25%pa (I didn't find one).

It is an indictment on this nation that so many people still think today's situation is going to last forever and don't build in sufficient slack in their finances to allow them to continue if the bad old days (or at least something like them) return.

Alfa Mortgages founder, Adam Smith, pointed out that an individual’s ability to manage increased payments is what their financial dependency is.

“It all comes down to an individual’s personal financial situation, specifically, the number of monthly credit commitments, responsibilities like child maintenance or school fees,” he explained.

“In essence your key consideration is your net disposable monthly income and your ability to absorb rising costs and potential interest rate hikes.”

FT Adviser's editor Simoney Kyriakou speculated on how financial dependencies might have influenced Freeman and his decision to quit his ministerial post.

Simoney Kyriakou
While my inclination is to agree, I've run the maths:

On a £118,000 salary, the take home pay will be £72,215 after tax and National Insurance. This equates to £6,018 per month and £1,389 per week. If he works 5 days per week, this is £278 per day, or £35 per hour at 40 hours per week.

Assuming he is the sole breadwinner in his new marriage, that's £24,000 a year on the mortgage payments alone.

- leaves about 48,000 for the rest of the expenses. Assume he also pays child support still to his two children from his previous marriage - let's say £1,000 a year; that's down to £36,000.

Monthly bills? Say another £1000pcm - that leaves him with a £24,000

Discretionary spending of £1,000pcm? £12,000

Still leaves him with £12,000 a year ...

HMMMM... perhaps I need to relocate and seek election in his district, I could do with £12,000 spare cash sloshing around each year!!!

....

tom.dunstan@ft.com

What's your view?

Have your say in the comments section below or email us: ftadviser.newsdesk@ft.com