SIPP  

Talbot & Muir calls for standardisation of Sipp reporting

Talbot & Muir calls for standardisation of Sipp reporting

Talbot & Muir has called on the self-invested personal pensions (Sipp) industry to standardise its reporting on non-standard investments (NSIs)

The independent Sipp and small self-administered scheme (Ssas) specialist has issued a due diligence document designed to explain what advisers need to know when considering which self-invested personal pension (Sipp) provider to work with.

Talbot & Muir believes industry standardisation of NSI reporting is key to making it easier for advisers and their clients to compare pension providers.

Article continues after advert

Graham Muir, director at Talbot & Muir, said: "It is now more important than ever for advisers to ensure their clients are with a provider that can be considered ‘safe’ and which has not stored up significant issues which may have a detrimental effect on service standards. 

"We strongly believe that there is a uniform way to disclose what is ‘under the bonnet’ of each Sipp provider.

"As there is no such disclosure at the moment, we have devised a list of questions with our responses that we believe will provide advisers with a much greater insight into a provider’s exposure to these problem issues.”"

Mr Muir added: "This is now available as part of our due diligence pack and we urge the industry to follow suit and provide a clear and uniform approach to this issue."

Talbot & Muir’s call for standardisation follows a number of court cases where Sipp providers have attempted to defend themselves over claims they should have done more due diligence on certain investments.

In October the High Court dismissed a case brought against the Financial Ombudsman Service by Sipp provider Berkeley Burke.

The case saw Berkeley Burke fight a decision from 2014, in which the Fos ruled the Sipp provider had to compensate a client after it failed to carry out adviser-style due diligence on his investment.