Mifid IIJan 22 2020

What advisers should have learned about Mifid II so far

  • Identify the main objectives of Mifid II
  • Describe how portfolio reporting works
  • Identify what advisers should be doing on fee disclosure
  • Identify the main objectives of Mifid II
  • Describe how portfolio reporting works
  • Identify what advisers should be doing on fee disclosure
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
What advisers should have learned about Mifid II so far

But market coverage was roughly around 70 per cent in the beginning, meaning roughly 30 per cent of the industry was not providing the required data which made the adviser’s task impossible.

A variety of new fee jargon has also come into play, with the likes of ex-ante, ex-post and transaction costs being required.

Two years down the line, it feels like the majority of the industry is up to speed and plain English is winning. 

Ex-ante is now 'estimated' and ex-post is described as 'actual'. Both are much easier for clients to digest.

Transaction costs, a new fee disclosure, which advisers and providers are required to make has also been interesting. 

I think there was some initial confusion around the ongoing charge figure (OCF) including or excluding transaction costs. 

I hope this confusion has now gone away. All should be clear that the OCF does not include transaction costs and that both need to be provided to clients.

With that clarified, the additional confusion of negative transaction costs has needed some work, when it comes to communicating with clients. 

How can a fund have negative transaction costs of say, 1 per cent?

I won’t patronise readers by going through the detail but it’s all to do with ‘slippage’ costs (another new bit of jargon) and the process a fund managers goes through in pricing trades. 

The movement of the price during the trade can result in positive or negative slippage costs. 

As a part of this process, we also get introduced to different pricing methods (more jargon coming up) including ‘arrival’, ‘opening’ and ‘closing’ pricing methods.

Client disclosure

So, where are we today in terms of what needs to be disclosed to clients?  

I’ll end this piece with a brief summary of what advisers need to be telling clients and should have been doing since the beginning of 2018, although virtually no one was.

Pre-sale reporting:

  • Product (fund), service (DFM, Platform, Isa) and adviser costs need to be aggregated in annualised percentage terms as well as pounds and pence, based upon the proposed investment
  • Cost and charging information needs to be given to the client in ‘good time’ before they provide the relevant service to the client
  • One-off costs (entry and/or exit, for example)
  • Ongoing costs (OCF)
  • Transaction costs
  • Incidental costs, including performance fees
  • Total fees related to funds should be quoted as ‘estimated’ (ex-ante) and include:
  • If more than one fund is being recommended then the above fees should be provided at both an individual fund level and aggregated to illustrate the total recommendation.

Post-sale reporting:

Ongoing reporting is a bit more detailed, as one might expect, and should cover the following:

PAGE 3 OF 4