Inheritance TaxJul 11 2018

How to protect your estate from have-a-go challengers

  • Learn about different factors that can trigger an inheritance dispute.
  • Understand why a challenge to a will might succeed.
  • Understand how to minimise risk of challengers.
  • Learn about different factors that can trigger an inheritance dispute.
  • Understand why a challenge to a will might succeed.
  • Understand how to minimise risk of challengers.
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
twitter-iconfacebook-iconlinkedin-iconmail-iconprint-icon
Search supported by
pfs-logo
cisi-logo
CPD
Approx.30min
How to protect your estate from have-a-go challengers

Another alternative is to consider asking the solicitor to include a ‘no challenge’ clause in the will. This may be accompanied by a modest legacy to the person who may otherwise have been excluded.

For example, the client may leave a legacy of £50,000 to a beneficiary with a direction that if that person challenges the will, or the amount received under it, then the legacy will be forfeit and the beneficiary will receive nothing. 

These clauses are not always legally effective – for example, if a will is ruled to be invalid by a judge, then the ‘no challenge’ clause would fall away as well. However, at the very least the clause can act as a deterrent.

Leaving a modest legacy to someone the client may wish to exclude can also deter claims under the Inheritance Act in other ways.

In order for a claim under the Inheritance Act to succeed, the person claiming has to prove that the financial provision made for him or her in the will is not reasonable in all the circumstances.

Depending on the circumstances, leaving a person nothing at all can be reasonable. However, it becomes more difficult to argue that provision is unreasonable where the potential claimant has been left something. 

Unfortunately, none of the above methods (or indeed any other method) is a foolproof way to avoid disputes post-death.

But it may be of some comfort to know that the courts are slow to interfere with a person’s testamentary wishes as demonstrated by the Supreme Court’s decision last year referred to earlier, in which the sanctity of the principle of testamentary freedom was confirmed.

The courts will need a good reason to depart from the wishes of a testator; a party who considers that the dispositions in a will are simply unfair is unlikely to find favour with a judge. The courts are not in the business of judging a testator’s morality.

Despite not being able to avoid disputes entirely, there are things that can be done as we have seen above. Taking professional advice is the key. That, in combination with careful planning while the client is alive, will assist in ensuring the last wishes are respected.  

Gareth Ledsham is a partner in the trust and estates dispute team at Russell-Cooke

PAGE 4 OF 4
CPD
Approx.30min
Please answer the six multiple choice questions below in order to bank your CPD. Multiple attempts are available until all questions are correctly answered.
  1. Will disputes and claims are brought under which Act?
  2. Is the following statement true or false? A rapidly ageing population leading to an increase in those diagnosed with dementia is causing more will challenges.
  3. What is recommended whenever taking instructions from an elderly testator to confirm they have testamentary capacity?
  4. In what circumstance would a beneficiary bringing a claim succeed?
  5. When it comes to disputes, many of them arise because a testator has done what, according to the author?
  6. What does a 'no challenge' clause in a will do?
  7. To bank your CPD you must sign in or Register.